Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 13;6(3):zrac068. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac068

Table 3.

Pathological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open lateral pelvic lymph node dissection

Variables Lap (n = 126) Open (n = 70) P*
p/ypT category 0.121
 T0–2 48 (38.1) 19 (27.1)
 T3–4 78 (61.9) 51 (72.9)
p/ypN category 0.443
 N0 63 (50.0) 31 (44.3)
 N1–2 63 (50.0) 39 (55.7)
Differentiation 0.307
 WD/MD 117 (92.9) 61 (88.6)
 PD/mucinous/SRC 9 (7.1) 8 (11.4)
Positive resection margin 12 (9.5) 8 (11.4) 0.673
 CRM involvement (<1 mm) 10 (8.1) 7 (10.3) 0.603
 DRM involvement (<1 mm) 2 (1.6) 1 (1.5) 0.552
Pathologic complete response 7 (5.6) 8 (11.4) 0.138
Pathological LPLN metastasis 32 (25.4) 25 (35.7) 0.128
 Unilateral 30 (23.8) 24 (34.3) 0.116
 Bilateral 2 (1.6) 1 (1.4) >0.999
Number of metastatic LPLNs, median (range) 0 (0–7) 0 (0–7) 0.098
 Unilateral 0 (0–4) 0 (0–3) 0.238
 Bilateral 0 (0–7) 0 (0–7) 0.482
Number of collected LPLNs, median (range) 7 (0–23) 10 (0–46) 0.027
 Unilateral 6 (0–16) 9 (0–29) 0.021
 Bilateral 14 (2–23) 13 (3–46) 0.459
Mesorectal LN metastasis 58 (46.0) 26 (37.7) 0.260
Number of metastatic mesorectal LNs, median (range) 0 (0–9) 0 (0–8) 0.370
Number of collected mesorectal LNs, median (range) 26 (6–97) 20 (3–76) 0.095

Lap, laparoscopic; pCR, pathologic complete response; WD, well differentiated; MD, moderately differentiated; PD, poorly differentiated; SRC, signet ring cell; CRM, circumferential resection margin; DRM, distal resection margin; LPLN, lateral pelvic lymph node; LN, lymph node.

*

P values were calculated using the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables and the chi-squared test for categorical variables. Values are n (%) unless otherwise indicated.