Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 25;37(6):706–716. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac002

Table 3.

Comparing recent VHSNC studies

Study Methodology VHSNC performance measures
Kumar et al. (2016) Qualitative, cross-sectional, Uttar Pradesh Active engagement of president; lack of motivation of members to participate actively; lack of operational guidelines’ intersectoral collaboration
Scott et al. (2017) Qualitative, longitudinal over 1.5 years, rural North India Social hierarchies at village level; resource and capacity deficits of health system; lack of operational capacity for intersectoral collaboration; fragmented lines of accountability
Ved et al. (2018) Qualitative, based on a 2-year pilot experience, North and South India State/district mechanisms needed for VHSNC capacity-building; for resource provision and fund release; capacity to monitor and learn from the field to provide feedback for policy
Dhiman et al. (2020) Qualitative, cross-sectional, Himachal Pradesh VHSNC member awareness about committee’s role; member responsibility; how funds were being used
Abdul Azeez et al. (2021) Descriptive statistics, cross-sectional, Chattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh Active participation of Gram Panchayat and members