Table 3.
Comparing recent VHSNC studies
| Study | Methodology | VHSNC performance measures |
|---|---|---|
| Kumar et al. (2016) | Qualitative, cross-sectional, Uttar Pradesh | Active engagement of president; lack of motivation of members to participate actively; lack of operational guidelines’ intersectoral collaboration |
| Scott et al. (2017) | Qualitative, longitudinal over 1.5 years, rural North India | Social hierarchies at village level; resource and capacity deficits of health system; lack of operational capacity for intersectoral collaboration; fragmented lines of accountability |
| Ved et al. (2018) | Qualitative, based on a 2-year pilot experience, North and South India | State/district mechanisms needed for VHSNC capacity-building; for resource provision and fund release; capacity to monitor and learn from the field to provide feedback for policy |
| Dhiman et al. (2020) | Qualitative, cross-sectional, Himachal Pradesh | VHSNC member awareness about committee’s role; member responsibility; how funds were being used |
| Abdul Azeez et al. (2021) | Descriptive statistics, cross-sectional, Chattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh | Active participation of Gram Panchayat and members |