Table 1.
Study Characteristic | N |
---|---|
Country of corresponding author | |
United States | 23 |
The Netherlands | 9 |
United Kingdom | 7 |
Canada | 6 |
Australia | 6 |
Japan | 4 |
Sweden | 4 |
Germany, Greece, Iran, Korea, Singapore, Spain | 2 each |
China, Finland, Lebanon, Malaysia, South Korea, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand | 1 each |
Study design for preference elicitation study | |
Cross-sectional | 46 |
Randomized controlled trial | 16 |
Cohort, prospective | 14 |
Cohort, retrospective | 3 |
Respondents | |
Patients | 56 |
Public, women | 11 |
Public | 5 |
Public, women and patients | 3 |
Public and patients | 2 |
Health care professionals | 2 |
Health utility elicitation method | |
EQ-5D | 51 |
SG | 13 |
TTO | 12 |
VAS | 10 |
SF-6D | 4 |
SHE | 2 |
TMI | 2 |
AQOL-4D, 15D, QOL VAS, VR-6D, HALex | 1 each |
AQOL, Australian Quality of Life; SF-6D, HALex, Health and Activities Limitation Index, Short Form-6D; SG, standard gamble; SHE, Subjective Health Estimation; TMI, Testing Morbidities Index; TTO, time tradeoff; QOL, quality of life; VAS, visual analog scale; VR-6D, Veterans RAND-6D.