Table 2.
Feminine Gender Role Stress and Feelings of Femininity Predicting Self-Esteem: Studies 1 and 2
| Variables | B | 95% CI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | t | p | r | ||
| Study 1 | ||||||
| Feminine Gender Role Stress | –.177 | –.326 | –.027 | –2.333 | .021 | .161 |
| Daily Feelings of Femininity | .207 | .166 | .249 | 9.828 | .000 | .240 |
|
Feminine Gender Role Stress X Daily Feelings of Femininity |
.061 | .012 | .110 | 2.445 | .015 | .062 |
| Study 2 | ||||||
| Feminine Gender Role Stress | –.578 | –.848 | –.309 | –4.239 | .000 | .315 |
| Weekly Feelings of Femininity | .210 | .152 | .268 | 7.103 | .000 | .230 |
|
Feminine Gender Role Stress X Weekly Feelings of Femininity |
.114 | .024 | .204 | 2.480 | .013 | .082 |
Effect sizes (r) were computed using Rosnow and Rosenthal (2008) formula: r = √(t 2 / t 2 + df). In these multilevel models, the Satterthwaite approximation is applied to provide specific degrees of freedom for each effect representing the weighted average of the between and within-person degrees of freedom, which were used to calculate the effect sizes. The significant 2-way interactions between daily and weekly feelings of femininity and feminine gender role stress are shown in Fig. 1
CI confidence interval