Table 3.
Comparison of PCA clusters and DASH conformations for each CDR from the dataset.
Method | % of CDRs | ||
---|---|---|---|
More apo sampling | Equal sampling | More holo sampling | |
PCA (Cartesian analysis) | 38.9 | 57.4 | 3.7 |
DASH (dihedral analysis) | 22.2 | 75.9 | 1.9 |
Percentages are rounded to one decimal place.