Skip to main content
. 2022 May 30;13:884110. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.884110

Table 3.

Comparison of PCA clusters and DASH conformations for each CDR from the dataset.

Method % of CDRs
More apo sampling Equal sampling More holo sampling
PCA (Cartesian analysis) 38.9 57.4 3.7
DASH (dihedral analysis) 22.2 75.9 1.9

Percentages are rounded to one decimal place.