TABLE 2.
Subgroup analysis on effects of FCC intervention on delirium prevalence
| Categories | No. of studies | No. of patients | Pooled RR (95% CI) | Heterogeneity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Random | p‐Value | I² (%) | p‐Value | |||
| FCC component | ||||||
| Single‐component | 2 | 1814 | 0.64 (0.29, 1.40) | 0.260 | 93 | <0.001 |
| Multi‐component | 5 | 848 | 0.50 (0.30, 0.81) | 0.005 | 80 | <0.001 |
| Study design | ||||||
| RCTs | 3 | 1805 | 0.90 (0.65, 1.24) | 0.500 | 42 | 0.180 |
| Quasi‐RCTs | 4 | 857 | 0.41 (0.32, 0.51) | <0.001 | 18 | 0.300 |
| Region | ||||||
| China | 3 | 719 | 0.40 (0.29, 0.56) | <0.001 | 43 | 0.170 |
| Other countries | 4 | 1943 | 0.68 (0.42, 1.11) | 0.120 | 84 | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; FCC, Family‐centred Care; RR, risk ratio. Bold values are statistically significant.