TABLE 3.

Sensitivity analysis on effects of FCC intervention on delirium prevalence

Outcome	Before sensitivity analysis			Remove study	After sensitivity analysis
	Effect estimate	p	I 2 (%)		Effect estimate	p	I 2 (%)
Delirium prevalence	0.54 (0.36, 0.81)	0.003	87	Mitchell et al., (2017); Rosa et al., (2019)	0.40 (0.33, 0.49)	<0.001	0
FCC component
Multi‐component	0.50 (0.30, 0.81)	0.005	80	Mitchell et al., (2017)	0.39 (0.30, 0.51)	<0.001	16
Study design
Quasi‐RCTs	0.41 (0.32, 0.51)	<0.001	18	Gan Xiaoqing et al., (2017)	0.46 (0.36, 0.58)	<0.001	0
Region
China	0.40 (0.29, 0.56)	<0.001	43	Gan Xiaoqing et al., (2017)	0.48 (0.35, 0.66)	<0.001	0

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; FCC, Family‐centred care; RR, risk ratio.