Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 28;132(6):1432–1447. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00025.2022

Table 3.

Baseline muscle size predicts muscle growth regardless of primary outcome measure

Baseline Variable Postvariable Correlation, r n Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI P Value Sex Adjusted β AdjustedP Value
CT muscle area, cm2 % Change in CT muscle area −0.18 44 −0.45 0.13 0.25 −0.75 0.002
Bilateral thigh muscle mass normalized, kg/cm % Change in bilateral thigh muscle mass normalized −0.26 48 −0.51 0.02 0.07 −0.47 0.04
Mean fCSA, µm2 % Change in mean fCSA −0.42 32 −0.67 −0.09 0.02 −0.76 0.003
Type 1 fCSA, µm2 % Change in Type 1 fCSA −0.51 32 −0.73 −0.20 0.003 −0.73 0.001
Type 2 fCSA, µm2 % Change in Type 2 fCSA −0.27 32 −0.56 0.09 0.14 −0.43 0.12

CI, confidence interval; CT, computed tomography; fCSA, fiber cross-sectional area.