Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 13;24(4):413–421. doi: 10.1007/s40272-022-00510-5

Table 2.

Incidence of emergence agitation

Group Alf2
(n = 57)
Group Alf4
(n = 57)
Group Sal
(n = 58)
PAED score 6.4 (3.5) 5.8 (3.8) 9.6 (5.1)
PAED score vs group Sal (95% CI) 3.218 (1.368–5.068) 3.797 (1.947–5.647)
P value < 0.01 < 0.01
PAED > 10 13 (22.9%)* 12 (21.1%)* 28 (48.3%)*
PAED vs group Sal (95% CI) 0.317 (0.142–0.708) 0.286 (0.126–0.647)
P value < 0.01 < 0.01
Aono’s score ≥ 3 13 (22.8%) 13 (22.8%) 28 (48.3%)
Aono’s score vs group Sal (95% CI) 0.317 (0.142–0.708) 0.317 (0.142–0.708)
P value < 0.01 < 0.01

Alf2 0.2 μg/kg/min alfentanil, Alf4 0.4 μg/kg/min alfentanil, CI confidence interval, PAED Paediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium, Sal saline

*The incidence of emergence agitation in Group Sal was significantly higher than other two groups (P < 0.05)

There were no significant differences between Groups Alf2 and Alf4, the PAED score of GroupAlf2 and Alf4 was significantly lower than that of Groups Sal (P < 0.05)

The aono’s scores in Group Sal was significantly higher than other two groups (P < 0.05)