Table 2.
Group Alf2 (n = 57) |
Group Alf4 (n = 57) |
Group Sal (n = 58) |
|
---|---|---|---|
PAED score | 6.4 (3.5)† | 5.8 (3.8)† | 9.6 (5.1)† |
PAED score vs group Sal (95% CI) | 3.218 (1.368–5.068) | 3.797 (1.947–5.647) | – |
P value | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | – |
PAED > 10 | 13 (22.9%)* | 12 (21.1%)* | 28 (48.3%)* |
PAED vs group Sal (95% CI) | 0.317 (0.142–0.708) | 0.286 (0.126–0.647) | – |
P value | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | – |
Aono’s score ≥ 3 | 13 (22.8%)‡ | 13 (22.8%)‡ | 28 (48.3%)‡ |
Aono’s score vs group Sal (95% CI) | 0.317 (0.142–0.708) | 0.317 (0.142–0.708) | |
P value | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | – |
Alf2 0.2 μg/kg/min alfentanil, Alf4 0.4 μg/kg/min alfentanil, CI confidence interval, PAED Paediatric Anaesthesia Emergence Delirium, Sal saline
*The incidence of emergence agitation in Group Sal was significantly higher than other two groups (P < 0.05)
†There were no significant differences between Groups Alf2 and Alf4, the PAED score of GroupAlf2 and Alf4 was significantly lower than that of Groups Sal (P < 0.05)
‡The aono’s scores in Group Sal was significantly higher than other two groups (P < 0.05)