Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 13.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2020 Jul 13;147(11):3250–3261. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33129

Table 1:

Association between MATS risk score and clinicopathological factors

Training Cohort Validation Cohort
MATS risk score MATS risk score
Variables Low High P value Low High P value
(N=107) (N=35) (N=144) (N=142)
Gender
Male 58 26 0.03 73 89 0.04
Female 49 9 71 53
Age
<65 71 24 0.80 42 54 0.11
≥65 36 11 102 88
Location
Colon 57 14 0.17 104 80 0.005
Rectum 50 21 40 62
Histology
Differentiated 99 30 0.22 135 126 0.13
Undifferentiated 8 5 9 16
Tumor size
≤45mm (median) 58 13 0.07 69 43 0.002
>45mm 49 22 70 94
not available 5 5
T stage
T1–3 79 22 0.21 108 90 0.03
T4 28 13 36 52
Lymphatic invasion
Absent 73 19 0.13 70 61 0.36
Present 34 16 74 80
not available 0 0 0 1
venous invasion
Absent 43 10 0.21 18 10 0.12
Present 64 25 126 131
not available 0 0 0 1
Lymphnode Metastasis
Absent 40 14 0.78 95 65 <0.001
Present 67 21 49 77
Preoperative CEA
<5 75 21 0.26 85 77 0.53
5≤ 32 14 58 61
not available 0 0 1 4