Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 13;9:42. doi: 10.1186/s40658-022-00454-2

Table 9.

Comparison of the recovery coeficient (RC) for the 3mm diameter rod, uniformity and Spill-Over Ratio (SOR) of different preclinical PET scanners. Data are taken from  [515, 38]

System Recon. method Corrected for AC/SCb RC STD (%) SOR (%)
Uniform region Water chamber Air chamber
SAFIR 3D MLEM yes/yes 0.49 3.0 17.3 18.5
Hyperion IID 3D MLEM yes/yes 0.91 3.7 5.4 6.3
NanoScan penalized MLEM yes/yes 0.9 3.5 6.2 5.8
MuPET FBP3DRP yes/no 0.75 6.5 9 5
Inveon FORE + 2D FBP yes/yes 0.72 5.3 1.7 −0.6
IRIS OSEM yes/no 0.73 7 11 11
ClearPET 3D OSEMa no/no 0.42 10.9 36.9 26.7
Mosaic HP 3D RAMLAa yes/yes 0.56 5.1 6.3 2.7
LabPET 8TM 2D MLEM no/no 0.58 7.0 20 11
microPET R4 FOREa + 2D FBP yes/no 0.60 4.5 6.2 4.6
Xtrim-PET FORE + 2D OSEM no/no 0.68 3.8 25 35
Bruker 3D MLEM yes/no 0.91 4.5 6.2 4.6

aFORE = Fourier Rebinning; RAMLA = Row-Action Maximum-Likelihood Algorithm; OSEM = Ordered Subset Expectation Maximization

b AC = Attenuation Correction; SC = Scatter Correction