Table 1.
Author (published year) | Study design | No. of patient | Artery | Clinical outcomes | Significance of reperfusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mokin et al. (2016) [2] (2011–2015) | Multicenter retrospective | 100 | VBAO | 3-mo mRS 0–2 | Successful recanalization is a predictor of good outcome. |
Bouslama et al. (2017) [3] (2005–2015) | Two center retrospective | 214 | VBAO | 3-mo mRS 0–2 | Reperfusion predicts good outcomes (aOR, 10.80; 95% CI, 1.36–85.96). |
Gory et al. (2018) [4] (2010–2016) | Multicenter ETIS registry | 100 | BAO | 3-mo mRS 0–2 | Reperfusion predicts good outcome (aOR, 5.64; 95% CI, 1.32–24.06). |
VBAO, vertebrobasilar artery occlusion; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; ETIS, Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke; BAO, basilar artery occlusion.