Skip to main content

Table 2.

Literature review of recent series on CCK-type implants

Author Cases Follow-up (years) KSKS (mean) KSFS (mean) Survival rate Causes of failure (implant removal) Type of prosthesis HKA (mean, °) Radiolucent lines > 1 mm
Nakano et al. (23) 41 4.1 82.9 79.2 97.5% 1 infection LCCK 174.9 Not reported
Kim YH et al. (21) 114 7.2 90 64 96% 3 aseptic loosening and 2 infections LCCK 174.5 4%
Lee JK et al. (22) 79 5.3 88.8 73.4 93% 4 infections and 1 aseptic loosening LCCK 174 41%
Hwang SC et al. (20) 15 2.4 81 85 100% None LCCK 176.9 18%
Cholewinski et al. (33) 43 11 90 61 88.5 % 2 infections and 1 instability LCCK 179.5 50%
Kwon KT et al. (34) 18 6.7 84.8 63.6 94.5% 1 infection LCCK 5 valgus 27.8%
Ye CY et al. (24) 47 5.5 80 85 95% 2 infections LCCK Not reported 4%
Morris MJ et al. (12) 101 1 78 48.4 96% 1 aseptic loosening, 3 infections Vanguard 360 Not reported 4%
Peters CL et al. (17) 184 4 85 82 92% 2 aseptic loosening and 13 infections Maxim and Vanguard SSK Not reported 7%
Lackey WG et al. (18) 297 4.8 77.4 66.3 92.6% 12 infections, 3 aseptic loosening, 7 other causes Vanguard SSK Not reported Not reported
Crawford DA et al. (19) 278 6 78.6 54.5 84% 25 aseptic loosening, 10 infections Vanguard SSK Not reported 3.9%
Current study 19 2.7 76 65 63.1% 7 aseptic loosening Vanguard 360 179 42%