Skip to main content
. 2022 May 31;10:875938. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.875938

Table 3.

Induction therapy after diagnosis according to the disease groups.

L1 L2 L3 UC IBD-U
(N = 182) (N = 52) (N = 782) (N = 653) (N = 111)
Receive induction therapy 166 (91.2%) 49 (94.2%) 741 (94.8%) 620 (94.9%) 102 (91.9%)
Antibiotics 15 (9.0%) 7 (14.3%) 90 (12.1%) 43 (6.9%) 14 (13.7%)
Mesalazine/sulfasalazine 73 (44.0%) 6 (12.2%)*a,b,c,d 410 (55.3%) 471 (76.0%) 77 (75.5%)
Exclusive enteral nutrition therapy (EEN) 57 (34.3%) 5 (10.2%)*a,b 247 (33.3%) 15 (2.4%) 10 (9.8%)
Corticosteroids
Systemic 61 (36.7%) 20 (40.8%) 271 (36.6%) 251 (40.5%) 28 (27.5%)
Rectal 1 (0.6%) 3 (6.1%) 16 (2.2%) 18 (2.9%) 3 (2.9%)
Immunomodulators 18 (10.8%) 11 (22.4%) 242 (32.7%) 135 (21.8%) 11 (10.8%)
Tacrolimus 0 0 0 0 0
Methotrexate 0 1 (9.1%) 6 (2.5%) 2 (1.5%) 1 (9.1%)
Azathioprine 16 (88.9%) 9 (81.8%) 235 (97.1%) 123 (91.1%) 10 (90.9%)
Cyclosporin A 2 (11.1%) 1 (9.1%) 1 (0.4%) 10 (7.4%) 0
Biologicals 3 (1.8%) 1 (2.0%) 36 (4.9%) 7 (1.1%) 2 (2.0%)
Adalimumab 0 0 1 (2.8%) 0 0
Infliximab 3 (100%) 1 (100%) 29 (80.5%) 5 (71.4%) 2 (100%)
Other 0 0 6 (16.7%) 2 (28.6%) 0
*

p < 0.05 Student's t-test.

a

L2 vs. L1.

b

L2 vs. L3.

c

L2 vs. UC.

d

L2 vs. IBD-U.