Skip to main content
. 2000 Mar;66(3):1167–1174. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.3.1167-1174.2000

TABLE 1.

Performance summary for the wastewater treatment plant during the 3 months of sampling

Process or parameter Value for sample taken in:
January 1995 February 1995 April 1995
Activated sludge process
 Influent STOCb load (lb/day) 121,927 128,465 149,909
 Influent methanol concn (mg/liter) 101 124 108
 Influent acetic acid concn (mg/liter) 484 422 516
 Flow split into 3 aeration basins (1/2/3) 40/40/20 40/40/20 40/40/20
 Sludge age (days) 12.1 15.4 11.8
 Solids inventory (tons) 734 815 752
 Basin temp (°F) 87.7 85.8 95.3
 Sludge volume index (g/ml) 199 202 140
 Total filament rating (0–6)a 3.2 3.3 4.0
Hyphomicrobium rating (0–6)a 2.4 2.0 4.6
 Clarification polymer concn (ppm) 16.1 19.3 10.5
 Effluent total suspended solids (mg/liter) 6.2 6.8 11.1
 Effluent STOC concn (mg/liter) 24 24 27
 Aeration basin dissolved oxygen concn (mg/liter) 1.5 1.8 1.7
Sludge dewatering process
 Waste activated-sludge concn (mg/liter) 19,708 18,545 26,915
 Spin solids (% total solids) 8.6 8.6 12.9
 Belt filter press cake solids (% total solids) 10.5 10.3 13.3
 Cake production (dton/day) 60.2 53.1 62.6
a

Microscopic rating scale based on that of Jenkins et al. (19): 0, none; 1, few; 2, some; 3, common; 4, very common; 5, abundant; and 6, excessive. 

b

STOC, soluble total organic carbon.