Skip to main content
. 2022 May 27;12:873839. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.873839

Table 2.

Comparison of MRI morphological characteristics of LGGs and HGGs.

Parameters LGGs (n = 43) HGGs (n = 123) χ2 /Z value P value
Hemorrhage# Present 1 (2.3%) 29 (24.4%) 9.900 0.002**
None 41 (97.7%) 90 (75.6%)
Cystic lesion Present 15 (34.9%) 64 (54.2%) 4.723 0.030*
None 28 (65.1%) 54 (45.8%)
Peritumoral edema None 25 (58.1%) 18 (14.6%) -5.010 < 0.001***
Mild 8 (18.6%) 35 (28.5%)
Severe 10 (23.3%) 70 (56.9%)
Tumor boundary Clear 28 (65.1%) 49 (39.8%) 8.187 0.004**
Blur 15 (34.9%) 74 (60.2%)
Enhancement pattern No enhancement 27 (62.8%) 13 (10.7%) 52.773 < 0.001***
Patchy enhancement 13 (30.2%) 41 (33.9%)
Rim enhancement 3 (7.0%) 67 (55.4%)
Distribution of lesions Single lobe 18 (41.9%) 28 (22.8%) 20.940 < 0.001***
Trans-lobe growth with corpus callosum involvement 5 (11.6%) 26 (21.1%)
Trans-lobe growth with insula involvement 5 (11.6%) 34 (27.6%)
Trans-lobe growth 2 (4.7%) 22 (17.9%)
Thalamus or brain stem 13 (30.2%) 13 (10.6%)

#Hemorrhage status was evaluated as uncertain in a total of 5 patients.

Cystic lesion status was evaluated as uncertain in a total of 5 patients.

Two patients did not undergo MRI enhancement examination.

Significance level markers P < 0.05*, P < 0.01**, P < 0.001***.