Skip to main content
. 2022 May 30;13:887238. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.887238

Figure 6.

Figure 6

GIPR activation had no effect on peripheral inflammation and glucose level. Systematic administration of D-Ala2-GIP (A, B) (n = 5 in control and CFA+Pro3+D-Ala2 groups, n = 6 in CFA and CFA+D-Ala2 groups) or ACC local injection of D-Ala2-GIP (C, D) (n = 11 in CFA group, n = 12 in other groups) did not reduce edema in CFA-injected hindpaw. GIPR knockdown did not reduce the footpad thickness in CFA-injected hindpaws (E, F) (n = 12 per group). There was no distinguished difference in the level of serum IL-1β (G) (n = 11 in CFA+D-Ala2 group, n = 12 in other groups) among the groups. D-Ala2-GIP or Pro3-GIP had no evident effect on the blood glucose level (H) (n = 7 in control, CFA+D-Ala2 and D-Ala2 groups; n = 6 in CFA and Pro3 groups; n = 5 in CFA+Pro3+D-Ala2 group). Totally, 155 mice were used for statistics in this figure. NC means Negative Control; GIPR-KD means GIPR knockdown; D-Ala2 means D-Ala2-GIP; Pro3 means Pro3-GIP. *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.