Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 11.
Published in final edited form as: Multisens Res. 2021 Aug 11;35(1):29–78. doi: 10.1163/22134808-bja10060

Table 3.

Correlations within cortical mask (r-map threshold p < 0.001, cluster-corrected p < 0.05 (except (b), FDR corrected q < 0.05), cluster thresholds = (a, c) 5 voxels, (d) 4 voxels; x,y,z, Talairach coordinates for centers of gravity.

Region x y z Mean r
(a)Attend visual (C > I) – RT congruency effect
L SMG1 −50 −45 35 −.72
(b)Attend visual (C > I) – OSIVQ verbal score
R SFS2 27 8 49 .70
(c)Attend auditory (I > C) – RT congruency effect
R preSMA 3 5 52 .73
R POF – precun3 12 −66 37 .73
R IFS - IFG 32 12 28 .72
R a Ins - fo 34 25 7 .74
L preSMA −6 5 47 .72
L pIPS - midIPS – AG4 −27 −57 41 .73
L aIPS – SMG5 −35 −45 36 .71
(d)Attend auditory (I > C) – OSdiff score
R MOG 44 −61 3 .73
L SMA −5 −5 63 .71
L precun −6 −57 52 .74
L IOS −22 −79 20 .74
L p calcS - LG −10 −84 −6 .72
1

Overlaps with the language control L SMG in Table 2e.

2

Contiguous with the language control R SFS/MFG in Table 2e.

3

Contiguous with the language control R precun – POF in Table 2e.

4

Contiguous with the language control L AG/IPS in Table 2e.

5

Overlaps with the incongruency effect L aIPS/SMG in Table 1 and contiguous with the language control L SMG in Table 2e.