Skip to main content
. 2022 May 30;10:833960. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.833960

Table 5.

The proportion of sex disparity in myopia explained by puberty and behavioral factors, in boys and girls 11 to 18 years of age in the 2014 CNSSCH. sample size = 125,466).

Sex (girls vs. boys) PERM
β PR (95%CI) P
Unadjusted model 0.11 1.118 (1.105, 1.132) <0.001 NA
Basic model 1 0.12 1.122 (1.110, 1.135) <0.001 NA
Additionally adjusted models
Puberty 0.10 1.102 (1.090, 1.114) <0.001 16.71%
Weekend outdoor activity 0.12 1.122 (1.109, 1.134) <0.001 0.61%
Weekend study activity 0.11 1.116 (1.105, 1.129) <0.001 4.78%
Physical activity time per day 0.11 1.121 (1.109, 1.134) <0.001 0.94%
Homework time per day 0.11 1.117 (1.105, 1.129) <0.001 4.30%
Self-report study pressure 0.12 1.122 (1.110, 1.135) <0.001 0.19%
Near screen time per day 0.11 1.120 (1.108, 1.133) <0.001 1.68%
Sleep duration per day 0.11 1.121 (1.108, 1.133) <0.001 1.41%
All seven behavioral factors (Basic model 2) 0.10 1.109 (1.097, 1.120) <0.001 11.14%
Basic model 2 + puberty 0.09 1.090 (1.079, 1.102) <0.001 16.75%

PR, prevalence ratio. PERM, percentage of excess risk mediated. NA, not applicable. In the basic model, we adjusted for exact age, urban–rural location, regional SES within province, fixed effect of province, and the cluster effect of school.