Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 15;209:52–60. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.05.022

Table 5.

Baseline and final model explaining 25.9% of the variance of the coping score.

Models Independent variables Standardised regression coefficient β (standard error) P valuea
Baseline model Quarantine as IP vs CP −.022 [.022] .040
Age (in years) .184 [.001] <.001
Sex female vs male −.106 [.022] <.001
Migration background no vs yes −0.011 [.047] .292 n.s.
SES medium or low vs high .043 [.027] <.001
Chronical diseases yes vs no .000 [.025] .984 n.s.
Living situation with balcony and/or garden vs no access to outdoors −.020 [.030] .072 n.s.
Living with a partner yes vs no .011 [.024] .335 n.s.
Living with child(ren) yes vs no −.007 [.026] .611 n.s.
Brief resilience scale score .138 [.015] <.001
Psychological disstress score −.281 [.017] <.001
Healthy Eating Index (unhealthier vs healthier or no change) .122 [.023] <.001
Physical activity during quarantine yes vs no −.167 [.023] <.001
Final model Quarantine as IP vs CP −.022 [.022] .046
Age (in years) .186 [.001] <.001
Sex female vs male −.107 [.022] <.001
SES medium or low vs high .042 [.027] <.001
Living situation with balcony and/or garden vs no access to outdoors −.020 [.029] .070 n.s.
Brief resilience scale score .138 [.015] <.001
Psychological disstress score −.280 [.017] <.001
Healthy Eating Index (unhealthier vs healthier or no change) .122 [.023] <.001
Physical activity during quarantine yes vs no −.167 [.023] <.001
a

Linear regression; significance level set at ≤.05.