Table 3.
Summary of studies examining the chronic effects of exercise on EPCs
| Study | Study design | Participant characteristics | Exercise Prescription | EPC phenotype identified by flow cytometry and units in brackets | Results on circulating EPCs and other major findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trials that included MICON exercise | |||||
| Cesari et al.(2012) | Independent groups, before and after |
Compliant group: n = 21 healthy overweight/obese Non-compliant group: n = 19 healthy overweight/obese Median age (whole group): n = 40, 48yrs, 55% males |
Length: 3 months Frequency: 3x/Week. Duration: 45 min. Modality: Aerobic exercise (walking/running) Intensity: ≤ IAT |
CD34+/KDR+ and CD133+/KDR+ and CD34+/CD133+/KDR+ (Cells/106 events) |
↑ in compliant group only Compliant group: CD34+/KDR+: Pre 14 (9–19) vs Post 21 (15–27), P = 0.04 CD133+/KDR+: Pre 13 (8–18) vs Post 20 (15–24), P = 0.02.—CD34+/CD133+/KDR+: Pre 9 (6–13) vs Post 14 (11–17), P = 0.04 Non-compliant group: CD34+/KDR+: Pre 18 (12–23) vs Post 21 (13–28), P = 0.3. CD133+/KDR+: Pre 18 (12–24) vs Post 21 (14–28), P = 0.2.—CD34+/CD133+/KDR+: Pre 15 (11–18) vs Post 18 (12–24), P = 0.2. Relationship between fat mass loss and increase in CD133+/KDR+ EPCs in compliant group (r = 0.50, P = 0.04) |
| Landers-Ramos et al. (2016) | Single arm | EX group: n = 11 healthy, 36% males, 61.0 ± 2.1yrs, VO2max: 29.3 ± 1.5 ml.kg1.min−1 | Length: 10 days. Frequency: Daily. Duration: 60 min/day. Modality: Aerobic exercise (walking/running). Intensity: ~ 70%VO2max |
CD34+/KDR+ (Cells / 105 events) |
↑ by 104%. Pre: 24.86 ± 6.55 vs Post 50.78 ± 12.96, P < 0.05 ↔ VO2max; ↑ FMD; no correlation between ΔFMD and ΔEPCs (P > 0.05) |
| Niemiro et al. (2018) | Independent groups, before and after |
EX group 1: n = 17 healthy lean sedentary, 53% males, 23.9 ± 5.4yrs, VO2max: 40.3 ± 5.3 ml.kg−1.min−1 EX group 2: n = 10 healthy obese sedentary, 30% males, 29.0 ± 8.0yrs, VO2max: 31.3 ± 5.0 ml.kg−1.min−1 |
Length: 6 weeks. Frequency: 3x/Week. Duration: 30-60 min. Modality: Aerobic exercise on treadmill or bike. Intensity: 60–75% HRR |
CD45−/CD34+/CD31+ (Cells/μl) |
↔ in both groups after intervention EX group 1: Pre 0.01 ± 0.02 vs Post 0.005 ± 0.005, P > 0.05 EX group 2: Pre 0.05 ± 0.012 vs Post 0.008 ± 0.01, P > 0.05 ↑ VO2max (both groups); ↓ SDF-1α (EX group 2); ↔ G-CSF |
| Thijssen et al. (2006) | Single arm | EX group: n = 8 healthy sedentary, 100% males, 67-76yrs, VO2max: 30.8 ± 4.8 ml.kg−1.min1 | Length: 8 weeks. Frequency: 3x/Week. Duration: 20 min. Modality: Aerobic exercise on a cycle ergometer. Intensity: 65%HRR up to 85%HRR |
CD34+/KDR+ (Cells/μl) |
↓ by 45.7% post training Pre 35 ± 12 vs Post 19 ± 8, P < 0.05 ↔ VO2max; ↓ VEGF |
| Xia et al. (2012) | Single arm | EX group: n = 25 healthy elderly, 100% males, 67.8 ± 3.4yrs | Length: 12 weeks. Frequency: 3x/Week. Duration: 30 min. Modality: Aerobic exercise on treadmill. Intensity: Not reported |
CD34+/KDR+ and CD133+/KDR+ (% PBMNCs) |
↑ in both EPC phenotypes CD34+/KDR+: Pre 0.023 ± 0.005 vs Post 0.039 ± 0.006, P < 0.05 CD133+/KDR+: Pre 0.019 ± 0.004 vs Post 0.027 ± 0.01, P < 0.05 ↑ FMD |
| Yang et al. (2013) | Independent groups, before and after |
EX group 1: n = 10 healthy elderly sedentary, 100% males, 61 ± 3yrs EX group 2: n = 10 healthy young sedentary, 100% males, 27 ± 3yrs |
Length: 12 weeks. Frequency: 3x/Week. Duration: 30 min. Modality: Aerobic exercise on a treadmill. Intensity: 4.0 METS for older sedentary and 5.5 METS for young sedentary |
CD34+/KDR+ (% PBMNCs) |
↑ by ~ 83% and ~ 22% for EX group 1 and 2 respectively EX group 1: Pre 0.018 ± 0005 vs Post 0.033 ± 0.010, P < 0.005. EX group 2: Pre 0.027 ± 0.006 vs Post 0.033 ± 0.006, P < 0.005 ↓ baPWV by 5.1% and 2.6% for EX group 1 and 2 respectively; relationship between decreased baPWV with EPCs (r = 0.73, P < 0.05) |
| Trials that included HIIT | |||||
| Rakobowchuk et al. (2012) | Independent groups, before and after |
EX group 1: n = 9 healthy, 33% males, 23.7 ± 3.4yrs, VO2peak: 34.7 ± 6.5 ml.kg−1.min1 EX group 2: n = 11 healthy, 36% males, 23.1 ± 2.5yrs, VO2peak: 35.7 ± 8.3 ml.kg−1.min1 |
Length: 6 weeks. Frequency: 3x/week. Duration: Progressed from 30 to 40 min/session. Modality/Intensity: EX group 1: Repeated 10 s interval at 120% PWR with 20 s recovery at 20 W. EX group 2: Repeated 30 s intervals at 120% PWR with 60 s recovery at 20 W |
CD34+/CD133+/KDR+ and CD34+/KDR+ (Cells/mL) |
↔ in any group EX group 1: CD34+/CD133+/KDR+: Pre 16 ± 18 vs Post 14 ± 12, P > 0.05. CD34+/KDR+: Pre 67 ± 80 vs Post 47 ± 47, P > 0.05 EX group 2: CD34+/CD133+/KDR+: Pre 8 ± 6 vs Post 19 ± 13, P > 0.05. CD34+/KDR+: Pre 34 ± 37 vs Post 79 ± 125, P > 0.05 ↑ VO2max (EX group 2); ↔ FMD (both groups) |
| Trials that compared HIIT to MICON | |||||
| Tsai et al.(2016) | RCT |
EX group 1: n = 20 healthy sedentary, 100% males, 22.2 ± 1.6yrs, VO2max: 43.2 ± 1.2 ml.kg−1.min1 EX group 2: n = 20 healthy sedentary, 100% males, 22.3 ± 1.0yrs, VO2max: 40.3 ± 1.4 ml.kg−1.min1 Control group: n = 20 healthy sedentary, 100%males, 22.4 ± 2.1yrs, VO2max: 42.3 ± 2.1 ml.kg−1.min1 |
Length: 6 weeks. Frequency: 5x/Week. Duration: 30 min. Modality/Intensity: EX group 1: HIIT cycle ergometer 5 sets of 3 min at 80%VO2peak with 3 min recovery at 40%VO2peak EX group 2: Aerobic exercise on a cycle ergometer at 60%VO2peak |
CD34+/KDR+ and CD34+/KDR+/CD133+ and CD34+/KDR+/CD31+ (Cells/mL) |
↑ for both EPC phenotypes in EX group 1 and 2 but no in control group EX group 1: CD34+/KDR+: Pre 422 ± 54 vs Post 565 ± 82, P < 0.05. CD34+/KDR+/CD133+: Pre 196 ± 41 vs Post 298 ± 79, P < 0.05.—CD34+/KDR+/CD31+: Pre 76 ± 19 vs Post 169 ± 39, P < 0.05 EX group 2: CD34+/KDR+: Pre 400 ± 42 vs Post 587 ± 79, P < 0.05. CD34+/KDR+/CD133+: Pre 185 ± 38 vs Post 278 ± 71, P < 0.05. CD34+/KDR+/CD31+: Pre 66 ± 11 vs Post 109 ± 36, P > 0.05 Control group: CD34+/KDR+: Pre 432 ± 54 vs Post 426 ± 63, P > 0.05. CD34+/KDR+/CD133+: Pre 167 ± 31 vs Post 177 ± 36, P > 0.05 CD34+/KDR+/CD31+: Pre 72 ± 10 vs Post 79 ± 16, P > 0.05 ↑ Mon-1 EPCs (EX group 1); ↑ Mon-2 EPCs (EX group 1); ↑ VO2max (both EX groups but higher in EX group 1); ↑ NOx (both EX groups but higher in EX group 1); ↑ plasma VEGF-A (EX group 1); ↑ SDF-1α (EX group 1) ↑; MMP-9 (EX group 1); correlation between VO2max with CD34+/KDR+/CD133+ EPCs, (r = 0.673, P < 0.0001) |
| Trials that compared MICON exercise and other forms of aerobic exercise | |||||
| Jo et al. (2019) | RCT |
EX group 1: n = 21 post-menopausal with CV risk: > 20%, 100% females, > 50yrs, VO2peak: 22.3 ± 0.68 ml.kg1.min1 EX group 2: n = 13 post-menopausal with CV risk: > 20%, 100% females, > 50yrs, VO2peak: 23.0 ± 0.69 ml.kg−1.min−1 Control: n = 13 post-menopausal with CV risk: > 20%, 100% females, > 50yrs, VO2peak:21.0 ± 0.6 ml.kg−1.min−1 |
EX group 1: Length: 12 weeks. Frequency: daily. Duration: 40 min. Modality: Aerobic exercise (Running based exergame). Intensity: 120 ± 19 bpm. EX group 2: Length: 12 weeks. Frequency: daily. Duration: 40 min. Modality: Aerobic exercise (Running/jogging). Intensity: 60–80%HRR |
CD34+/KDR+ (Cells/μl) |
↑ of CD34+/KDR+ EPCs in EX group 2 only. EX group 1: Pre 13.8 ± 35 vs Post 17.1 ± 22.2, P > 0.05 EX group 2: Pre 1.5 ± 3.8 vs Post 19.2 ± 17.5, P < 0.01 Control group: Pre 6.9 ± 9.5 vs Post 6.2 ± 11.9, P > 0.05 ↑ VO2peak (EX groups 1 and 2); ↑ FMD (EX groups 1 and 2) |
baPWV branchial artery pulse wave velocity, bpm beats per minute, CV cardiovascular, EPCs endothelial progenitor cells, EX exercise, FMD flow mediated dilatation, G-CSF granulocyte colony stimulating factor, HIIT high intensity interval training, HRR heart rate reserve, IAT individual anaerobic threshold, mL millilitre, METS metabolic equivalents, MICON moderate intensity continuous training, MMP-9 matrix metalloproteinase 9, Mon-1 EPCs Monocytic 1 derived EPCs, Mon-2 EPCs Monocytic 2 derived EPCs, NOx Nitric oxide metabolites nitrite/nitrate, PBMNCs peripheral blood mononuclear cells, PWR peak work rate, RCT randomised control trial, SDF-1α stromal cell derived factor 1 alpha, VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor, VO2peak/max peak/max oxygen uptake, W watts, yrs years, μL microliter, ↑ indicates significant increase, ↓ indicates significant reduction ↔ indicates no significant change