Table 6.
Willingness to pay and 95% confidence intervals by attribute level and country/region (Euro)
Attribute | Change | Nordic countries | Spain | UK | USA | China |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘Option value’b | Treatment vs no treatment | 11,098.35a | 13,615.13a | 12,000.61a | 28,217.86a | As preferences over cost were insignificant in the Chinese sample, meaningful estimates of willingness to pay cannot be inferred from the part-worth utilities |
10,095.56; 12,101.14 |
12,967.91; 14,262.34 |
11,347.04; 12,654.18 |
26,556.80; 29,878.91 |
|||
Likelihood of success | 25% to 10% | − 3340.9a | − 3238.95a | − 3556.84 | − 6161.88a | |
− 1399.30; − 5335.70 |
− 1564.12; − 5200.95 |
− 1841.67; − 5308.37 |
− 4938.08; − 14,233.36 |
|||
25% to 40% | 3575.74a | 3422.58a | 3399.00a | 6290.66a | ||
6401.52; 836.86 |
5598.78; 1,255.24 |
6081.04; 725.96 |
16,305.13; 1946.53 |
|||
Risk of complications | 5% to 2% | 1224.16a | 1030.57a | 784.42a | 662.25 | |
1662.73; 785.58 |
1907.29; 203.53 |
1059.51; 509.32 |
1365.32; -40.81 |
|||
5% to 8% | − 1540.63a | − 1359.61a | − 824.24a | − 1308.61a | ||
− 1108.34; − 1972.91 |
− 1088.06; − 1631.16 |
− 554.51; − 1093.97 |
− 606.34; − 2010.89 |
|||
Discomfort | Strong to mild | − 4625.24a | − 4701.54a | − 1615.53 a | − 4275.56 | |
− 18,159.16; 4860.13 |
− 19,374.17; 5957.98 |
− 8595.87; 3829.59 |
− 23,048.14; 10,268.30 |
|||
Shared decision making | Some to none | − 1810.23a | − 753.71a | − 779.36a | − 1798.31a | |
− 1381.69; − 2238.77 |
− 485.55; − 1021.88 |
− 512.76; − 1045.96 |
− 1102.88; − 2493.75 |
|||
Some to full | 2820.18 | 1422.61 | 1592.11a | 3041.30a | ||
5803.56; − 11.16 |
2948.50; − 54.07 |
2887.80; 248.13 |
7743.07; 665.32 |
|||
Daily injections | 3 to 1 | 430.59* | 636.63a | 190.02 | 514.95 | |
854.94; 6.24 |
903.46; 369.81 |
458.17; − 78.14 |
1213.76; − 183.87 |
|||
3 to 5 | − 22.83 | − 469.1a | − 175.83 | − 302.61 | ||
401.54; − 447.2 |
− 202.95; − 735.24 |
91.03; − 442.7 |
392.13; − 997.34 |
A positive value indicates that respondents would theoretically be willing to pay to secure a move to a more preferred level and a negative value indicates that respondents would theoretically be willing to pay to avoid a move to a less preferred level
aSignificant at a 95% confidence level
bOption value averages across treatment-specific constants A and B