Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Trends Genet. 2022 Apr 18;38(7):632–636. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2022.03.012

Table 1:

Molecular features of pluripotent and in vitro experimental totipotent-like cells

Features mESCs hESCs (naïve) 2CLCs [2] EPSCs [8, 9] TBLCs [12] TLSCs [13]
Embryonic tissue contribution Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Extra embryonic contribution to trophectoderm (TE)
(i) Chimera assays (in vivo) No Ethically challenging Yes# Yes### Yes Yes
(ii) Blastoid-formation assay (in vitro) No Yes Yes## Yes### Yes Yes
(iii) Trophoblast stem cell (TSC) reprogramming No Yes Not tested Yes### Not tested Not tested
Transcriptomic profiles
Global comparison with mouse early embryonic states (Single-cell RNA-seq) Similar to pre- implantation epiblast stage Similar to pre- implantation epiblast stage Not compared with in vivo totipotent cells Similar to 4- and 8C stages### Similar to 2- and 4-cell stages Similar to 2- and 4-cell stages
Totipotency or 2C markers No No High No High High
Pluripotency markers High High Low High Low Low
MERVL Low Show HERV expression High No High High
Genomic landscape
Chromatin mobility Low comparable High Not tested Not tested Not tested
Chromatin accessibility Low comparable High Not tested High; 8 cell and ICM-specific open ATAC-seq peaks High, 2- & 4-cell specific open chromatin
DNA methylome High comparable Low Intermediate / Dynamic*; higher level of 5hmC Low Not tested
In vitro culture
Self-renewal Yes Yes Transient Yes Yes Yes
#

but not tested with stringency [7]

##

Done using EpiSC derived iBLCs sup ref 2 which are molecularly similar to 2CLCs; also not done with single 2CLC

###

Challenged by [11]

*

Varying levels of 5mC were found between mESCs cultured in different media and EPSCs generated from mESCs of different genetic backgrounds [8]

Here high/low and yes/no are based on a comparison with mESCs