Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 21;18(3):187–197. doi: 10.1007/s13181-021-00873-0

Table 4.

Bioavailability and pharmacokinetic comparisons between doses received population: PK analysis.

Low-dose sublingual/high-dose sublingual Low-dose sublingual/intravenous High dose sublingual/intravenous
Parameter statistic
AUC (min*ng/mL)
Ratio
Geometric mean 0.579 0.349 0.603
90% CI (0.526, 0.636) (0.317, 0.384) (0.552, 0.658)
Dose corrected ratio
Geometric Mean 1.157 0.698 NA
90% CI (1.053, 1.272) (0.634, 0.768)
AUCt (min*ng/mL)
Ratio
Geometric mean 0.546 0.306 0.561
90% CI (0.497, 0.600) (0.279, 0.337) (0.510, 0.616)
Dose corrected ratio
Geometric mean 1.093 0.613 NA
90% CI (0.994, 1.201) (0.558, 0.673)
Cmax (ng/mL)
Ratio
Geometric mean 0.549 0.049 0.090
90% CI (0.424, 0.712) (0.038, 0.064) (0.069, 0.117)
Dose corrected ratio
Geometric mean 1.098 0.099 NA
90% CI (0.847, 1.424) (0.076, 0.128)
AUC45 (min*ng/mL)
Ratio
Geometric mean 0.635 0.031 0.049
90% CI (0.432, 0.931) (0.021, 0.045) (0.033, 0.072)
Dose corrected ratio
Geometric mean 1.269 0.062 NA
90% CI (0.865, 1.862) (0.042, 0.091)
AUC60 (min*ng/mL)
Ratio
Geometric mean 0.558 0.045 0.081
90% CI (0.380, 0.821) (0.031, 0.066) (0.055, 0.119)
Dose corrected ratio
Geometric Mean 1.117 0.090 NA
90% CI (0.759, 1.643) (0.061, 0.132)
AUC120 (min*ng/mL)
Ratio
Geometric mean 0.499 0.121 0.242
90% CI (0.393, 0.634) (0.095, 0.153) (0.190, 0.307)
Dose corrected ratio
Geometric mean 0.998 0.241 NA
90% CI (0.786, 1.267) (0.190, 0.307)
AUC240 (min*ng/mL)
Ratio
Geometric mean 0.529 0.233 0.440
90% CI (0.462, 0.605) (0.203, 0.266) (0.385, 0.504)
Dose corrected ratio
Geometric mean 1.058 0.466 NA
90% CI (0.924, 1.210) (0.407, 0.533)

AUC, area under curve to infinity; AUCt, AUC to last quantifiable data point; AUC45, AUC to 45-min timepoint; AUC60, AUC to 60-min timepoint; AUC120, AUC to 120-min timepoint; AUC240, AUC to 240-min timepoint; CI, confidence interval; Cmax, maximum concentration; NA, not applicable; PK, pharmacokinetic

Note: Only subjects who had at least 2 periods where study drug was received with an evaluable PK profile were included in the comparisons. All statistics are back-transformed and based on a random effects linear model with log10 numeric response variable, adjusting for study dosage received, dosing sequence, and period, with a random effect for subject nested within dosing sequence

Note: Dose corrected ratios do not apply to the ratio of high-dose sublingual to intravenous due to the doses being equivalent