Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 16;2015(9):CD010350. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010350.pub2

Summary of findings 2. Very low versus low protein diet for people with CKD‐MBD.

Very low versus low protein diet for people with CKD‐MBD
Patient or population: people with CKD‐MBD
 Settings: outpatient clinic
 Intervention: very low protein intake
 Comparison: low protein intake
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Very low protein diet Low protein diet
Serum phosphorus 
 Follow‐up: 9 to 18 months Mean serum phosphorus (control)
 1.2 to 1.32 mmol/L Mean serum phosphorus (intervention)
 0.12 mmol/L lower 
 (0.5 lower to 0.25 higher)   41 (2) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 very low1,2,3  
PTH 
 Follow‐up: 9 to 18 months Mean PTH (control)
 23.11 to 139 pmol/L Mean PTH (intervention)
 9.98 pmol/L lower 
 (12.85 to 7.1 lower)   41 (2) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 very low1,2,3  
Serum calcium 
 Follow‐up: mean 9 months Mean serum calcium (control)
 2.3 mmol/L Mean serum calcium (intervention)
 No higher 
 (0.17 lower to 0.17 higher)   22 (1) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 very low1,4  
Alkaline phosphatase 
 Follow‐up: mean 9 months Mean alkaline phosphatase (control)
 123 U/L Mean alkaline phosphatase (intervention)
 22 U/L lower 
 (78.25 lower to 34.25 higher)   22 (1) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 very low1,4  
Mortality Not reported Not reported Not estimable Not estimable  
Cardiovascular events Not reported Not reported Not estimable Not estimable  
Fracture Not reported Not reported Not estimable Not estimable  
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% CI) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: confidence interval
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 The study reported using randomised controlled methods, but details of random sequence generation, allocation concealment and blinding were not reported
 2 Very low protein intake (0.3 g/kg/d) showed a positive effect; low protein diet (0.4 g/kg/d) showed a negative effect.
 3 Only published, small studies were included. Some negative results were reported.
 4 Only one published study was included.