Skip to main content
. 2022 May 31;10(5):e36388. doi: 10.2196/36388

Table 2.

Study characteristics.

Author (year) Clinical objective How was fairness evaluated? Was racial bias identified? How was the AIa model biased? Was racial bias mitigated? Protected class
Abubakar et al (2020) [29] Identification of images of burns vs healthy skin Accuracy Yes Poor accuracy of models trained on a Caucasian data set and validated on an African data set and vice versa Yes Dark-skinned patients, light-skinned patients
Allen et al (2020) [30] Intensive care unit (ICU) mortality prediction Equal opportunity difference (FNRb disparity) N/Ac N/A Yes Non-White patients
Briggs and Hollmén (2020) [31] Prediction of future health care expenditures of individual patients Balanced accuracy, statistical parity, disparate impact, average odds, equal opportunity N/A N/A Yes Black patients
Burlina et al (2021) [32] Diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy from fundus photography Accuracy Yes Lower diagnostic accuracy in darker-skinned individuals compared to lighter-skinned individuals Yes Dark-skinned patients
Chen et al (2019) [33] ICU mortality prediction, psychiatric readmission prediction Error rate (0-1 loss) Yes Differences in error rates in ICU mortality between racial groups No Non-White patients
Gianattasio et al (2020) [34] Dementia status classification Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy Yes Existing algorithms varying in sensitivity and specificity between race/ethnicity groups Yes Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black patients
Noseworthy et al (2020) [35] Prediction of left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% from the electrocardiogram (ECG) AUROCd No N/A No Non-White patients
Obermeyer et al (2019) [36] Prediction of future health care expenditures of individual patients Calibration Yes Black patients with a higher burden than White patients at the same algorithmic risk score Yes Black patients
Park et al (2021) [37] Prediction of postpartum depression and postpartum mental health service utilization Disparate impact, equal opportunity difference (TPRe disparity) Yes Black women with a worse health status than White women at the same predicted risk level Yes Black patients
Seyyed-Kalantari et al (2021) [38] Diagnostic label prediction from chest X-rays Equal opportunity difference (TPR disparity) Yes Greater TPR disparity in Hispanic patients No Non-White patients
Thompson et al (2021) [39] Identification of opioid misuse from clinical notes Equal opportunity difference (FNR disparity) Yes Greater FNR in the Black subgroup than in the White subgroup Yes Black patients
Wissel et al (2019) [40] Assignment of surgical candidacy score for patients with epilepsy using clinical notes Regression analysis of the impact of the race variable on the candidacy score No N/A No Non-White patients

aAI: artificial intelligence.

bFNR: false-negative rate.

cN/A: not applicable.

dAUROC: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

eTPR: true-positive rate.