Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 15;54:44. doi: 10.1186/s12711-022-00728-4

Table 3.

Correlation among line B proportions estimated with different methodsa for the simulated data

Lines Method LR ADM REL_GP REL_GP_noF
Closely-related BOA 0.690 0.704 0.936 0.942
LR 1 0.943 0.633 0.644
ADM 0.943 1 0.647 0.659
REL_GP 0.633 0.647 1 0.994
REL_GP_noF 0.644 0.659 0.994 1
Distantly-related BOA 0.878 0.903 0.948 0.956
LR 1 0.963 0.817 0.834
ADM 0.963 1 0.844 0.859
REL_GP 0.817 0.844 1 0.991
REL_GP_noF 0.834 0.859 0.991 1
Unrelated BOA 0.948 0.965 0.951 0.961
LR 1 0.975 0.890 0.905
ADM 0.975 1 0.917 0.930
REL_GP 0.890 0.917 1 0.989
REL_GP_noF 0.905 0.930 0.989 1

aLine B proportions are estimated from estimated breed-origin-of-alleles (BOA), using linear regression on mean allele counts within line (LR), ADMIXTURE analysis (ADM), the genomic relationship with maternal grandsire (REL_GP), or this relationship after adjusting all self-relationships to 1 (REL_GP_noF)