Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Physiol Meas. 2020 May 4;41(4):044001. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab7f93

Table 3.

Performance summary of all six models

Model AUC ROC Test (Train) Specificity* Test (Train) Accuracy* Test (Train) PPV* Test (Train)
1 0.80 (0.80) 0.53 (0.50) 0.74 (0.72) 0.70 (0.69)
2 0.56 (0.59) 0.11 (0.18) 0.55 (0.58) 0.55 (0.58)
3 0.74 (0.70) 0.21 (0.22) 0.62 (0.60) 0.59 (0.59)
4 0.77 (0.76) 0.27 (0.27) 0.62 (0.62) 0.60 (0.61)
5 0.81 (0.88) 0.57 (0.71) 0.75 (0.82) 0.72 (0.80)
6 0.87 (0.90) 0.72 (0.81) 0.82 (0.86) 0.80 (0.86)
*

Model sensitivity was fixed at 0.90

Model 1: Purity-SQI, SampEn, RR-rSTD, ACC-STD from wristband

Model 2: Age, Race, and Gender

Model 3; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, and creatinine,

Model 4: body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation

Model 5: Models 2, 3, and 4 combined

Model 6: Model 1 + 5 combined