Table 3.
Study | Sample characteristics | Mobile phone & wireless devices measure | Mental health measure | Findings of interest | Covariates controlled for | Quality assessment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Calpbinici and Arslan [15] Turkey |
Total: 426 Mean age: 16.05 (SD = 1.26) 49.5% female |
- Daily duration of MP calls categorized into “none, ≤ 1 h, > 1 h” - Purpose of MP usage (talking/messaging, social media) |
Internalising: - Anxiety and depression symptoms: subscales from Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) Externalising: - Hostility: subscale from BSI Wellbeing: - Negative Self‐esteem subscale from BSI |
No significant difference between groups with daily speaking duration with regards any of the BSI subscales Adolescents who used MP more social media had significantly higher BSI mean for every subscale (p < .001) |
None | High risk of bias |
Foerster and Röösli [46] Switzerland |
Total: 412 Mean age: 14.1 (Range 10.4–17.0) 56.9% female |
Specific use of MP during weekend and weekdays: calls (minutes/day), text messages (f/day), online on MP (m/day), social networking. Categorised into “low, medium, high” |
Wellbeing: - Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): KIDSCREEN-52 |
Latent class analysis of MP use, general media use, and MPPUS-10 scores identified 5 distinct classes: Low Use, Medium Use, Gaming, Call Preference and High Social Use Significant difference in HRQoL found across groups in Physical Wellbeing (p = 0.002), Moods & Emotions (p < 0.001), Self-Perception (p > 0.001), Self-perception (p < 0.001), Parent Relations & Home Life (p < 0.001), Social Support & Peers (p < 0.001) & School Environment (p < 0.007). For the other four scales (Psychological Wellbeing, Autonomy, Financial Resources, Social Acceptance) no significant differences between the classes were found |
Sex, age, SES, ethnicity, educational attainment | High risk of bias |
George, et al. [45] USA (cross-sectional findings only) |
Total 151 Mean age: 13.1 (SD = 0.91) 48% female |
Hours spent texting and text messages sent by MP using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) |
Internalising: - Depressive Symptoms: 5 dichotomous items from the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) - Anxiety symptoms: 4 dichotomous items from the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children Externalising: - ADHD symptoms: 4 dichotomous items adapted from the DSM–IV symptom checklist - CD symptoms: 6 dichotomous items from DSM–IV and Child Behaviour Checklist *all measures modified for EMA |
Adolescents reported fewer anxiety (p = 0.007; incident rate ratio (IRR) = 0.99) and fewer depression symptoms (p = 0.006, IRR = 0.99) on days where they sent more text messages Association found between time on mobile phone texting and reduced anxiety symptoms, (b = 0.05 95% CI [0.09, 0.01] p < 0.05), but with increased risk of conduct disorder (b = 0.22 95% CI [0.10, 0.33] p < 0.001) and with increased risk of ADHD (b = 0.10 95% CI [0.04, 0.18] p < 0.01) No association found between duration of texting and depressive symptoms |
MH baseline | High risk of bias |
Guxens, et al. [52] Netherlands |
Total: 3102 Mean age: 5 Female: not reported |
Parent-reported frequency of MP and cordless phone calls |
Internalising & Externalising: - Mother & teacher-reported Strengths & Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Total Difficulties & all subscales. Subjects categorized in normal, borderline, and abnormal |
MP use for category < 1call/week had lower odds of teacher-reported total difficulties SDQ borderline/abnormal score when compared with no MP use (OR = 0.67, CI = [0.47–0.95]), but not for mother-reported total difficulties MP use for category < 1call/week had smaller risk of mother-reported peer relationship SDQ borderline/abnormal score than those with no use (OR = 0.61, CI = [0.42–0.91]) Children with cordless phone at home had lower odds of teacher-reported borderline/abnormal prosocial behaviour (OR = 0.68, CI = [0.48–0.97]) and lower odds of mother-reported peer relationship problems (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = [0.39–0.96]) No other teacher- or mother-reported SDQ subscales was significantly associated with cordless/MP phone calls Null result found when testing for trend between cordless/MP use and SDQ total difficulties score |
Sex, age, SES, family/parenting, Maternal factors (education, ethnicity, BMI tobacco, alcohol, MH, attachment) | High risk of bias |
Hosokawa and Katsura [51] Japan |
Total: 1642 Mean age: 6.88 (SD = 0.35 years) Female:48.8% |
Parent-reported average typical daily duration of smartphone and tablet use. Categorized into “regular and non-regular users” |
Internalising & Externalising: - Parent-reported SDQ. Subjects categorized into normal, borderline, abnormal |
Regular mobile device uses significantly associated with higher externalizing problems, specifically conduct problems (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: [1.03 ± 3.04], p < .05) and hyperactivity /inattention (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: [1.15 ± 2.87], p < .01) Regular mobile device uses not significantly associated with internalizing problems |
Sex, SES, parenting/family, baseline MH | High risk of bias |
Ikeda and Nakamura [10] Japan |
Total: 2698 First-years: 45.9% Second-years: 48.9 Third-years: 5.2% Female: 62.3% |
Average mean duration of MP use per week and per weekday and then stratified by quartiles |
Internalising: - 4 subcomponents (“Tension and excitement,” “Refreshing mood” “Depressed mood”, “Anxious mood.”) from the Mood Inventory |
Increased duration of MP use per week is associated with lower psychological mood, for tension and excitement (p < 0.001), and particularly depressed mood (p < 0.009). For males, total scores for ‘‘Depressed mood,’’ and ‘‘Tension and excitement,’’of the highest quartile of weekly MP use were significantly higher than for other quartiles (p < 0.05) No association between MP use and mood scores was found in female subgroup |
Sex, age, school type, physical activity, previous MP-use, sleep behaviours | High risk of bias |
Mortazavi, et al. [16] Iran |
Total: 469 Mean age: 11 (SD = 2.33) 49.89% female |
Daily average duration of MP use for talking. Categorized into 4 groups: “No Use, Less than 10 min, 11–30 min, more than 30 min” |
Internalising: - Anxiety: 1 item Externalising: - Concentration problems:1 item - Attention problems: 1 item All items measured by 4-point Likert scale for frequency of symptoms |
Association between the duration of MP use when talking and self-reported symptoms of concentration problems (p < 0.001), attention problems (p < 0.001) and anxiety (p < 0.001) were found in students who had used MPs compared to those who had never used phones | None | High risk of bias |
Nishida, et al. [12] Japan |
Total: 295 Mean age: 16.2 (SD = 0.9) 41.4% female |
Daily duration of type of smartphone use including email, social networking sites, online chat, internet search and watching videos |
Internalising: - Depression: - Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D). Classified as depressed if score > 16 |
No association between general smartphone use and depression among male students OR = 1.09, CI = [0.65–1.82] or females student OR = 1.58, CI = [0.95–2.63]) Stratified analysis by gender showed Increased duration of online chat (OR = 1.7, CI = [1.18–2.56]), and SNS (OR = 1.41, 95% CI = [1.04–1.92]) using smartphone was associated with depression among female students, but not in males (OR = 1.09, 95% CI = [0.65–1.82]) p:0.737 |
Sex, age, educational attainment, lifestyle, sleep behaviours, parenting/family | High risk of bias |
Przybylski and Weinstein [59] England |
Total: 120,115 Mean age:15 (SD not reported) Female: Not reported |
Daily duration of smartphones for social networking and chatting during free time on weekdays and weekend with categories |
Well-being: - Psychological Well-being: Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale |
Inverted-U-shape relationship between digital-screen time, smartphones and mental WB. Moderate engagement not harmful and may be advantageous. Optimum / extremum for weekday smartphone use is 1 h 57 min; optimum/extremum for weekend smartphone use is 4 h 10 min Effect size of weekday smartphone use on WB above extremum is b = – 0.53, 95% CI [– 0.56, – 0.49] Cohen’s d = – 0.20 Effect size of weekend smartphone use on WB above extremum is b = – 0.83, 95% CI [– 0.94, – 0.74] Cohen’s d = – 0.14 |
Sex, SES, ethnicity, technology access | High risk of bias |
Redmayne, et al. [14] New Zealand |
Total: 373 Mean Age: 12.3 (Range: 10.4–13.7) 44.2% female |
Frequency (number and duration) of cordless and MP use and type of MP headset. Cordless phone operating frequency, modulation system/approach |
Internalising symptoms: - Depressive symptoms: 1 item from the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children checklist measured by a 4-point Likert scale for frequency of symptoms |
Authors were not able to fit valid models with exposure variables of duration of cordless phones and MP calls, i.e. they could not determine if duration or frequency of use of wireless devices were associated with depressive symptoms Use of wired (OR = 0.90 [0.51–1.58]) or wireless (OR = 2.04 [1.09–3.82]) MP headsets was associated with frequency of depressive symptoms. Cordless phone frequency also associated with depressive symptoms, but only for frequencies ≤ 900 MHz (OR = 2.40 [1.15–5.02]) |
Sex, age, SES, woken by phone, illness, earpiece, headset, TV in bedroom | High risk of bias |
Roser, et al. [47] Switzerland |
Total: 412 Mean age: 14.0 (Range 12.1–17.0) 61.4% female Cohort: HERMES |
Self-report: - Frequency of outgoing/incoming calls - Frequency of outgoing text messages and duration of data traffic Data from MP operators: - Frequency of outgoing/incoming calls - Outgoing SMS and the volume of data traffic over previous 6 months |
Internalising &Externalising: - Parent & self-reported SDQ: Well-being: - HRQoL: KIDSCREEN-52 |
Ten-point increase in MPPUS-10 score was positively associated with β = 0.96 total difficulty score (95% CI [0.58, 1.35] p < 0.001). Positive association also found with hyperactivity (β = 0.42, 95% CI [0.26, 0.57]), conduct problems (β = 0.30, 95% CI [0.19, 0.41]) emotional symptoms (β = 0.17, 95% CI [0.02, 0.32]). Prosocial behaviour was significantly negatively associated with MPPUS-10 (β = – 0.14, 95% CI [– 0.25, – 0.04]) Six out of the ten HRQOL dimensions were significantly decreased (Moods and emotions, Self-perception, Autonomy, Parent relations and home life, Financial resources and School environment) in adolescents with higher MPPUS-10 score |
Sex, age, SES (educational level of parents), school level, nationality, self-reported freq of text messages sent | High risk of bias |
Tamura, et al. [11] Japan |
Total: 295 Mean age: 16.2 (SD = 0.9) 41.4% female |
Daily duration of type of smartphone use including email, social networking sites, online chat, internet search and watching videos |
Internalising: - Depression: CES-D. Classified as depressed if score > 16 |
Mobile phone use of ≥ 2 h per day for social network services (OR: 3.63, 95% CI [1.20–10.98]) and online chats (OR: 3.14, 95% CI [1.42–6.95]), was associated with a higher risk of depression, even when adjusting for sleep duration | Sex, age, school type, lifestyle, sleep behaviours, lifestyle, parenting/family | High risk of bias |