Figure 1.
Training and validation results. The training loss of Sets 1–7 approached zero. In Set 1, images of right and left eyes were easily distinguished, with the validation loss approaching zero and the validation accuracy thus approaching 1.0. In Sets 2–5, similar validation loss (~ 0.4) and validation accuracy (~ 90%) were obtained. For Set 6, which consisted of vertical images, the accuracy was slightly inferior compared to Sets 2–5. Set 7 showed the second-highest validation accuracy. In contrast to Sets 1–7, overfitting was observed in Set 8; in this set, training loss converged whereas validation loss diverged. The validation accuracy of Set 8 was around 0.5 and failed to improve over the learning period. OD oculus dexter, OS oculus sinister, H horizontal, V vertical.