Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 13;6(2):2473974X221105277. doi: 10.1177/2473974X221105277

Table 2.

Studies of Patients With Acute Rhinosinusitis. a

First Author Year Study type Patients b Saline type c Buffered Devices c Treatment duration Outcomes Main result
Adult
Chitsuthipakorn 31 2021 RCT 61: adult, ARS I: Isotonic saline (30). II: No saline (31) I: Yes. II: NA Squeeze bottle. 250 mL. 1 bottle/time 2 times/d, 2 wk SNOT-22, rhinologic subscore, symptom VAS, MLKES, % cure rate No difference between groups in any outcomes. Post hoc analysis showed the benefits of saline irrigation in the viral subgroup.
Piromchai 32 2021 RCT (crossover) 12: adult, ARS Isotonic saline Yes I: Syringe with nasal applicator (12). II: Syringe 10 mL alone (12). 10 min Overall effectiveness The syringe with nasal applicator had better overall effectiveness scores than the syringe alone.
Ramalingam 30 2019 RCT 61: adult, URI I: Irrigation and gargling with hypertonic seawater 2%-3% (30). II: No irrigation and gargling (31) I: Yes. II: NA Not stated. 100 mL 6 times/d, 2-14 d Duration of illness, OTC medication used, viral shredding Duration of illness reduced by 1.9 d and less medication used by 36% in the irrigation/gargling group
Chanaseeyotin 33 2016 RCT 48: adult, ABRS I: Isotonic saline (25). II: No saline (23) I: Yes II: NA Syringe. 20 mL, 5 times/nostril 2 times/d, 4 wk Symptom VAS, SNOT-20 No difference between groups in any outcomes.
King 35 2015 SRMA (3 studies) 542: adult (152), children (390), URI Isotonic saline or isotonic seawater vs no saline Any Spray. 2-3 sprays/nostril 3-6 times/d, 1-3 wk Days to resolution, antibiotic usage No difference between groups
Gelardi 29 2009 RCT 20: adult, ARS Warm isotonic saline (36 ºC) No I: Syringe 10 mL (10). II: Irrigation bag 250 mL (10) I: 3 times daily. II: 2 times/d, 2 wk Symptom (VAS), RMM Irrigation bag improved symptom and nasal resistance better than a syringe
Ural 4 2009 RCT 24: adult, AR/ARS/CRS I: Hypertonic saline 3% (12). II: Isotonic saline (12) I: No. II: No Syringe. 4 mL/side 2 times/d, 10 d STT Isotonic improved STT, but the hypertonic did not
Hauptman 34 2007 RCT 80: adult, ARS I: Hypertonic saline (40). II: Isotonic saline (40) I: Yes. II: Yes Spray. 1 mL/side, 1 time 10 min Symptoms, ARM, STT Not difference between groups for symptom reduction. Hypertonic better improved STT but had worse ARM than isotonic saline.
Passàli 28 2005 RCT 200: adult, ARS Isotonic saline No I: Atomized douche (7-8 mL) (100). II: Syringe 20 mL (100) 4 times/d, 15 d GSS, RMM, ARM, STT Atomized douche improved all outcomes. But the syringe did not
Inanli 27 2002 RCT 60: adult, ARS I: Hypertonic saline 3.0% (12). II: Isotonic saline (13). III: Nasal steroid spray (14). IV: Oxymetazoline 0.05% (9). V: No saline (12) I: Yes. II: Yes. III: NA. IV: NA. V: NA Irrigation 10 mL. 3 times/d, 3 wk STT No difference between groups
Adam 26 1998 RCT 119: adult, ARS I: Hypertonic saline 1.6% (41). II: Isotonic saline (35). III: no saline (43) I: Yes. II: No. III: NA Spray. 2 sprays/nostril 3 times/d, 1 wk Third-day nasal symptom score, days to resolution No difference between groups in any outcomes
Children
Cabaillot 41 2020 SRMA (4 studies) 489: children, ARS/URI Hypertonic saline 2.3% or isotonic saline (334) vs no saline (155) Any Drop, syringe, spray, jet flow. 2 d–3 wk Rhinologic score, health status scores. Saline irrigation benefited for rhinological symptoms
Satdhabudha 40 2017 RCT 74: children, ARS Hypertonic saline 1.25% Yes I: Squeeze bottle 240 mL (38). II: Syringe 20 mL (36) 2 times/d, 2 wk 5S, satisfaction score, medication used Squeeze bottle improved in 5S and satisfaction scores more than syringe
Köksal 39 2016 RCT 109: children, URI I: Isotonic saline (38). II: Hypertonic seawater 2.3% (36). III: No saline (35) I: No. II: Yes. III: NA Drop 3 vials daily, 5 d Nasal symptoms at days 1 and 7, sleep quality Saline and seawater drop relieved nasal symptoms and improved sleep quality vs no saline
Wang 38 2009 RCT 69: children, ARS I: Isotonic saline (30). II: No saline (39) I: No. II: NA Syringe. 15-20 mL. 1-3 times/d, 3 wk TSS, PRQLQ, nPEFR, nasal smear, Water’s film score Saline irrigation improved TSS, PRQLQ, nPEFR vs no saline
Šlapak 37 2008 RCT 390: children, common cold I: Isotonic seawater (99). II: Isotonic seawater (95). III: Isotonic seawater (95). IV: No saline (101) I: Yes. II: Yes. III: Yes. IV: NA I: Jet flow 9 mL/side. II: Fine spray 3 mL/side. III: dual formula fine spray 3 mL/side. IV: NA 6 times/d, 3 wk Nasal symptoms, medication used Saline group showed faster resolution of some nasal symptoms and less medication used
Bollag 36 1984 RCT 46: children, URI I: Isotonic saline (15). II: Phenylephrine drop (16). III: No saline (15) I: No. II: NA. III: NA Drop. 4 drops/side. Every 2 h, 2 d Nasal symptoms, respiratory symptom No difference between groups

Abbreviations: 5S, 5 Symptoms Score; ABRS, acute bacterial rhinosinusitis; AR, allergic rhinitis; ARM, acoustic rhinometry; ARS, acute rhinosinusitis; CRS, chronic rhinosinusitis; GSS, Global Symptom Score; MLKES, Modified Lund-Kennedy Endoscopic Score; NA, not applicable; nPEFR, nasal peak expiratory flow rate; OTC, over the counter; PRQLQ, Pediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RMM, rhinomanometry; SNOT, Sino-nasal Outcome Test; SRMA, systematic review and meta-analysis; STT, saccharin transit time; TSS, Total Symptom Score; URI, upper respiratory tract infection; VAS, visual analog scale.

a

Roman numerals indicate patients groups.

b

Patient total number, age group (number per group), and disease.

c

Number per group in parentheses.