Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 2;13:895230. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.895230

TABLE 3.

Changes in soil biochemical traits under the combined manure and mineral N fertilization.

pH (water) SOC (g kg–1) TN (g kg–1) MBC (mg kg–1) MBN (mg kg–1)
Year Treatment
2019 Neg-Con 5.93c 14.74b 1.40c 170d 23.34d
Pos-Con 5.91c 15.08b 1.41c 220c 31.44c
High-CM 6.25a 19.24a 1.78a 340a 44.67a
Low-CM 6.12b 16.81b 1.67b 310b 38.43b
High-PM 6.23a 18.92a 1.77a 341a 43.89a
Low-PM 6.13b 16.88b 1.64b 315b 39.44b
2020 Neg-Con 5.95d 14.88c 1.40d 175d 24.52e
Pos-Con 5.94d 15.52c 1.44c 235c 34.45d
High-CM 6.31a 24.74a 1.99a 370a 51.42ab
Low-CM 6.18c 22.25b 1.81b 355b 43.36c
High-PM 6.28ab 25.05a 1.98a 374a 54.58a
Low-PM 6.16c 21.77b 1.80b 311b 41.35c

SOC, soil organic carbon; TN, total nitrogen; MBC, microbial biomass carbon; MBN, microbial biomass nitrogen; Neg-Con, control; Pos-Con, 100% chemical fertilizer (CF); High-CM, 60% cattle manure (CM) + 40% (CF); Low-CM, 30% CF + 70% CF; High-PM, 60% poultry manure (PM) + 40% CF; Low-PM, 30% PM + 70% CF.

The mean comparison was made using Tukey tests for treatment mean in both years and the lettering was done based on the Tukey HSD test at 5% using a simple effect.

Values followed by the same letters within the column are statistically the same at P ≤ 0.05.