Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 2;13:787852. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.787852

Table 1.

Comparison of variant models and our model.

Method mAP FPS Batch size Input resolution
FasterRCNN 0.5396 7 2 600 × 600
MaskRCNN 0.6493 9 2 600 × 600
EfficientDet 0.6520 107 8 512 × 512
YOLOv3 0.5806 23 2 608 × 608
YOLOv4 0.6385 127 2 608 × 608
YOLOv5 0.6674 151 2 608 × 608
SSD300 0.6465 45 2 300 × 300
SSD300 0.6460 62 8 300 × 300
SSD512 0.6477 19 2 512 × 512
SSD512 0.6478 21 8 512 × 512
Our model 512 0.6825 147 2 512 × 512
Our model 512 0.6893 151 8 512 × 512
Our model 1024 0.6756 79 2 1024 × 1024

The bold values were used to label the best performing score compared with others.