Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 2;9:836572. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.836572

TABLE 10.

Top 10 compounds selected according to their best average ranking values, which in turn were calculated from each individual ranking and corresponding scores obtained using 3 docking software (GOLD, FRED and Dockthor).

Compound GOLD FRED Dockthor #Average ranking
score a # Ranking score b # Ranking score c # Ranking
Roc-A 38.8725 37 −4.8893 36 −7,816 31 34,7
PC-135638768 71.8748 2 −10.2612 1 −8.998 3 2.0
PC-18582767 64.5324 6 −9.8941 2 −8.640 9 5.7
PC-53093220 67.2732 3 −8.0923 14 −9.127 2 6.3
PC-16803784 65.4361 5 −8.9784 8 −8.633 10 7.7
PC-16811025 62.8643 9 −9.7540 4 −8.534 14 9.0
PC-16810171 63.3645 8 −9.8666 3 -8.342 19 10.0
PC-16810169 62.3539 10 −9.1083 7 −8.502 16 11.0
PC-53116405 77.7655 1 −6.9509 29 -−8.734 6 12.0
PC-17581023 58.6058 17 −8.1517 12 −8.659 8 12.3
PC-9115580 61.9378 12 −7.8324 18 −8.722 7 12.3
a

GOLD, score values obtained by CHEMPLP, scoring function.

b

FRED, Chemgauss4 score values.

c

predicted binding affinity by the DockTScore program given in kcal/mol units. PC: PubChem.