Table 5.

Projected differences from current intake for meat alternatives across the total population (n 1110)

Progressive Model
	Current	MA-25	P	MA-50	P	MA-75	P	MA-100	P
Energy, kJ/d	8995.60	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Carbohydrate, g/d	270·77	+4·39	0·25	+9·01	0·018*	+13·89	<0·001*	+19·04	<0·001*
Protein, g/d	86·67	–3·40	0·002*	–6·99	<0·001*	–10·77	<0·001*	–14·77	<0·001*
Fat, g/d	81·97	–0·78	0·55	–1·60	0·22	–2·46	0·06	–3·37	0·009*
Fibre, g/d	21·86	+1·88	<0·001*	+3·85	<0·001*	+5·93	<0·001*	+8·13	<0·001*
Sugars, g/d	110·52	+0·96	0·66	+1·97	0·36	+3·04	0·16	+4·16	0·05*
Saturated fat, g/d	30·96	–0·91	0·09	–1·88	0·001*	–2·89	<0·001*	–3·96	<0·001*
Na, mg/d	2413·80	+52·57	0·21	+107·94	0·01	+166·34	<0·001*	+228·03	<0·001*
Fe, mg/d	13·65	–0·06	0·93	–0·13	0·85	–0·20	0·78	–0·27	0·70
B12, μg/d	7·47	–0·40	0·66	–0·82	0·37	–1·26	0·17	–1·73	0·06

MA-25, replacement model substituting 25 % of self-reported meat intake with composite of meat alternatives; MA-50, replacement model substituting 50 % of self-reported meat intake with composite of meat alternatives; MA-75, replacement model substituting 75 % of self-reported meat intake with composite of meat alternatives; MA-100, replacement model substituting 100 % of self-reported meat intake with composite of meat alternatives.

Blue indicates significant increase compared with current. Gold indicates significant decrease compared with current.

*Differences compared using regression models with significance threshold P < 0.05.