Skip to main content
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2022 Jun 1;7(23):19152–19157. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c07202

Cluster of Hexamolybdenum [Mo6Cl14]2– for Sensing Nitroaromatic Compounds

Salomé Muñoz , Leonor Alvarado-Soto , José Gaete , Cesar Morales-Verdejo , Rodrigo Ramírez-Tagle ‡,*
PMCID: PMC9201897  PMID: 35721901

Abstract

graphic file with name ao1c07202_0006.jpg

This contribution describes a novel method for the detection of trace amounts of trinitrotoluene (TNT) using a cluster of hexamolybdenum with general formula [Mo6Cl14]2–. The molybdenum cluster was characterized by UV–visible, FT-IR, and fluorescence techniques, and the synthesis was efficient and reproducible. The evaluation of the molybdenum cluster by TNT detection was perfomed by fluoresecent measurements, and the results were interpreted by the Stern–Volmer equation, obtaining KSV values of 2.9 × 105 and 1.6 × 104 M–1 in different concentration ranges. Further, the results suggest that at TNT concentrations higher than 4 × 10–5 mM (0.01 mg L–1) it is possible to measure the quenching of the cluster fluorescence. The DFT calculations indicate that the contribution of the TNT in the active lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals that are involved in the higher intensity transitions in the complex cluster–TNT are significant. This situation differs from all the luminescent [M6X8L6]2– clusters (M = Mo; X = facial bridging ligand, and L = labile axial ligands), where most of the closely spaced excited states are located in the {M6X8}q+ core. Thus, the TNT switches off the cluster luminescence. The approach using a [Mo6Cl14]2–-based fluorescence sensor has the potential to be a sensing technology for the detection of nitroaromatic explosives.

1. Introduction

Substantial parts of modem solid-state inorganic chemistry may be identified with polynuclear coordination compounds of the well-known octahedral building block [M6X8L6]2– clusters, where M is Mo, X is the facial bridging ligand, and L is labile axial ligands, have attracted substantial interest because of the luminescent characteristics displayed by the {M6X8}q+ core.13 In the past decade, numerous photophysical and computational studies of in view of the interest in the photophysics and photochemistry of these cluster complexes have shed light on their electronic structure and spectroscopic properties.2,47

Some recent applications of these luminescent clusters are known. For example, a the cluster [Mo6Cl14]2– is a promising fluorescent component and could be studied in animal models at therapeutic doses for potential use in tracking cancer cells in vivo and as an antiviral agent and show promise as bioimaging agents and also as metal-based X-ray contrast media.810 Computational studies carried out by our research group indicate that the contribution of the axial pyridine ligands (py) in the active lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals that are involved in the higher intensity transitions in the [Mo6Cl8(py)6]4+ cluster are significant.4 This situation differs from all the luminescent [M6X8L6]2– clusters, where most of the closely spaced excited states are located in the {M6X8}q+ core.4 Moreover, the synthetic versatility of the {M6X8}q+ derived clusters has allowed the synthesis of extended new porous materials that can be used as molecular sieves or be used as starting material for designing versatile chemical sensors for the detection of a large variety of volatile organic contaminants.11,12 The detection of nitroaromatic compounds, best known as raw materials in explosives preparations, is important in many fields including environmental science, public security, and forensics.1317

This contribution describes the experimental and calculated electronic structure and the optical properties of the luminescent [Mo6Cl14]2– and not luminescent [Mo6Cl14]2––TNT complex. To evaluate the use of the molybdenum cluster as a sensor, the study of the TNT impact on the emission spectra and its influence on their photophysics was carried out.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Reagents and Apparatus

Reagents were purcheased of analytical grade and used without further purification. All procedures were carried out under a nitrogen atmosphere by using a vacuum atmosphere drybox equipped with a Model HE 493 Dri-Train purifier. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectra were measured using a JASCO FT-IR 4100 spectrometer in the frequency range 500–4000 cm–1. UV–visible spectra were recorded with a JASCO V-630 UV–visible spectrophotometer. Elemental analyses were made with a Fisons EA 1108 microanalyzer. Photoluminescence measurements were recorded with a JASCO FP-8200 spectrophotometer using an excitation of 312 nm and an emission range of 250–700 nm, with an integration time of 0.1 s and a slit of 5 nm. Samples were contained on 1 cm path length quartz cuvettes.

2.2. Synthesis of Molybdenum Cluster

A slightly modified preparation method was used to produce molybdenum cluster [Mo6Cl14]2–, with a higher yield and a more straightforward protocol.18 Briefly, an ampule with MoCl5 (5.00 g, 18.3 mmol) and bismuth (3.825 g, 18.3 mmol) was sealed under a vacuum and left in the receiver chamber of the oven. The ampule was placed in the center of a horizontal tube furnace, and the temperature was slowly raised to 230 °C over 2 h and then to 350 °C for an additional 2 h. Subsequently, the ampule was heated at 350 °C for 2.5 days. In the final stage, it was allowed to cool and then placed in the glovebox.

As a result, we obtained 4.066 g (theory for Mo6Cl12, 3.053 g) of a homogeneous crystalline olive green/brown nonvolatile product. A portion of this solid (2 g) was treated with concentrated HCl and recrystallized to yield 1.456 g of an orange-yellow chloromolybdic acid, (H3O)2[Mo63-Cl)8Cl6]·6H2O (extended formula of [Mo6Cl14]2–), 80% yield, based on MoCl5. Anal. Calc: Mo, 55.50 (average of three trials); UV–vis (DMSO), λmax, 330 nm; FT-IR, ν(OH), 3200–3600 water cluster.

A concentrated 5 mM stock solution of [Mo6Cl14]2– was prepared with 61 mg of molybdenum cluster dissolved in 10 mL of DMSO. Concentrated 22 mM stock TNT solution was prepared with 50 mg of TNT (purchased from Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in 10 mL of DMSO. For photoluminescent measurements, the molybdenum cluster was transferred (500 μL) to a 5 mL calibrated flask with TNT solution aliquots containing from 4 × 10–5 to 18 mM, and then the fluorescence spectra were recorded.

2.3. Computational Details

The computational calculations were carried out by using Amsterdam Density Functional (ADF) code.19 The scalar and spin–orbit relativistic effects were incorporated by using the zero-order regular approximation (ZORA).20 All the real cluster structures were fully optimized via analytical energy gradient method implemented by Verluis and Ziegler, employing the local density approximation (LDA) within the Vosko–Wilk–Nusair parametrization for local exchange correlations. We also used the GGA (Generalized Gradient Approximation) PW91 functional.21 The excitation energies were estimated by time-dependent perturbation density functional theory including relativistic scalar and spin–orbit effects (TDDFT). Solvation effects were modeled by a conductor-like screening model for real solvents (COSMO)22 using dichloromethane as solvent. The cluster geometry optimization and the excitations energies were calculated using a standard Slater-type-orbital (STO) basis sets with triple-ζ quality double plus polarization functions (TZ2P) for all atoms.19 We carried out harmonic frequency calculations on each cluster to confirm that the converged geometries were equilibrium structures.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Molybdenum Cluster

Several synthetic routes to chloromolybdic acid have been reported,18,2327 and one has been developed by our research group in high temperature solid-state inorganic synthesis by reduction with bismuth under a vacuum and heating at 350 °C for 2.5 days. Subsequently, a portion of this solid was treated with concentrated hydrochloric acid and recrystallized to yield of orange-yellow chloromolybdic acid, (H3O)2[Mo63-Cl)8Cl6]·6H2O with a 80% of yield. The stable molybdenum cluster was characterized using analysis elemental, FT-IR and UV–vis as are detailed below.

The hydration has been studied in numerous reactivity28,29 and spectroscopy experiments,3034 mainly elucidating the structure of clusters. The FT-IR spectrum exhibits broad absorption features that were assigned to rapid fluctuation of isomeric structures.31 This observation agrees with theoretical calculations and experimental results described in literature.35,36 As shown in Figure 1, the FT-IR spectrum of the molybdenum cluster is similar to that observed in published works,36 and it is possible to assign the broad absorption feature (3200–3600 cm–1) to the O–H stretching associated with the water present in the cluster chemistry structure.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

FT-IR spectrum of molybdenum cluster.

The UV–vis absorption spectrum of the molybdenum cluster was recorded in DMSO and is shown in Figure 2. Comparison of the absorption spectra of several clusters of the general formula [Mo6X14]2– suggest that the nature of the HOMO and LUMO, the lowest energy electronic transitions arise from metal to metal charge transfer (MMCT).4 The UV–vis spectrum shows the maximum absorption at 330 nm, and that value is comparable to the optical energy band gaps found from absorption spectra of reported previously for similar clusters [Mo6X14]2–, [Mo6X8(NCS)6]2– (X = Cl, Br, I), and [Mo6X8(CF3COO)6]2–.3,6,37,38 These optical energy gaps, obviously, refer to spin-allowed (i.e., singlet state to singlet state) transitions.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

UV–vis spectrum of the molybdenum cluster in DMSO.

3.2. Detection of Nitroaromatic Compounds

Detection of explosive materials is necessary in a variety of complex environments, including munitions storage facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, transportation areas, blast sites, and mine fields. In each of these settings, sensitive and timely detection of explosive materials is necessary to ensure the safety and security of the surrounding area.17,39 For this reason, the molybdenum cluster capacity of TNT sensing at low concentrations was evaluated by photophysics studies. The photoluminescent emission spectrum of molybdenum cluster in DMSO (excitation at 312 nm) is characterized by a broad band in the 330–600 nm range with a maximum at 409 nm (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effect of TNT on the emission fluorescence spectrum of the [Mo6Cl14]2– cluster (λex 312 nm, DMSO).

Nitroaromatic explosives, despite having an aromatic structure, do not fluoresce as result of the strong electron-withdrawing nature of the nitro substituents. Despite this lack of native fluorescence, many methods have been proposed in recent years for their detection using luminescence-based techniques. In this respect, fluorescence-based sensors are very promising.13,15,40,41

The quenching of the molybdenum cluster fluorescence by nitroaromatic compound was described using the Stern–Volmer equation.42

3.2. 1

where I0 is the fluorescence intensity without nitroaromatic compound, I is the fluorescence intensity observed in the presence of the nitroaromatic compound, and KSV is the Stern–Volmer constant.15

The linear Stern–Volmer plot was obtained in two sections (Figure 4a,b and Table 1) and the calculated parameters show sensibility for the nitroaromatic compound by the molybdenum cluster with a relatively large quenching (KSV = 1.6 × 104 to 2.9 × 105 M–1). Also, this result suggests that at TNT concentrations higher than 4 × 10–5 mM it is possible to measure the quenching of the cluster fluorescence.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Fluorescence quenching Stern–Volmer plots (a,b) of molybdenum cluster [Mo6Cl14]2– with increasing concentration of TNT.

Table 1. Stern–Volmer Parameters for the Quenching of the Molybdenum Cluster by TNT.

compound KSV [M–1] intercept R2 points [TNT] [mM]
[Mo6Cl14]2– 2.9 × 105 1.158 0.923 7 (0–3) × 10–3
  1.6 × 104 2.043 0.990 7 3 × 10–3 to 0.13

Regarding Table 1, on the one hand, a good fit is observed for both concentration ranges studied. However, the intercept value obtained in the (0–3) × 10–3 mM range is closer to the theoretical value presented in the Stern–Volmer equation. On the another hand, the behavior observed in the 3 × 10–3 to 0.13 mM range can be attributed to the appearance of significant collisional quenching between the molybdenum clusters (intercept different from 1).

The analysis of the Stern–Volmer calculated parameters shows that, besides the expected collisional quenching, there is probably the formation of a ground-state complex between the nitroaromatic compound and molybdenum cluster (vide infra). Indeed, the comparison of these constants with others corresponding to the quenching of fluorophores by nitrated substances shows that the now calculated values are several orders of magnitude higher (Table 2).

Table 2. Quenching Constants (KSV) for Different Compounds with Nitrocompounds.

compound KSV [M–1] compound concn range [mM] ref
[Mo6Cl14]2– 2.9 × 105 TNT (0–3) × 10–3 this work
  1.6 × 104   3 × 10–3 to 0.13  
pyrene 394 TNT   (43)
DAB-CdS 25 nitromethane 8.8–52.8 (44)
polyethylenimine capped carbon quantum dots 8.39 × 104 TNT 0–0.04 (45)
conjugated polymer (carbazole and tetraphenylethylene units) 8.5 × 104 TNT 0–0.07 (46)

For example, Goodpaster and McGuffin43 studied the fluorescence quenching of pyrene and related compounds by nitrated explosives and obtained maximum Stern–Volmer constants of nearly four hundred. Also, they have found that nitroaromatic compounds are more efficient quenchers than their aliphatic counterparts, with higher quenching constants. They have also found that the quenching constants increased with the increasing number of electron withdrawing nitro groups in the benzene ring. In another study using a CdS-DAB dendrimer nanocomposite by nitromethane, a KSV of 25 M–1 was observed.44 The results obtained are promising, but it is necessary to study the selectivity of the sensor in the future to validate a real application.

The theoretical calculations suggest that in the [Mo6Cl14]2– luminescent cluster, the HOMO is mainly metallic and most of the lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals are located in the {Mo6Cl8}4+ core.3,5 Thus, most of the allowed electronic transitions are of the MMCT type and the closely spaced excited states are all localized in the {Mo6Cl8}4+ core with no participation of the axial ligands.3,4 However, for the [Mo6Cl14]2––TNT complex, the HOMO is mainly metallic, but most of the lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals are made from [Mo6Cl14]2––TNT complex contributions and are not located in the {Mo6Cl8}4+ core. The participation of the TNT ligands in the closely spaced excited states is significant (see Figure 5), whereas the participation of the bridging Cl ligand is minor.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Selected active molecular orbitals of the [Mo6Cl14]2–TNT complex (a–f).

The excitation energies were calculated using the TDDFT formalism including scalar relativistic and solvent effects. Thus, this value shows that the participation of the TNT ligand in the active lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals that are involved in the higher intensity transitions in the [Mo6Cl14]2––TNT complex are significant (Figure 5). Because of the TNT acceptor capabilities, it may provide active vibrational acceptor modes, thus increasing the nonradiative decay and decreasing the luminescence. The remaining molecules in the excited-state are deactivated practically instantaneously after being excited since the quencher molecule is situated in the proximity of the excited molecules and interacts with them. Thus, the TNT switches off the cluster luminescence.

4. Conclusion

The characterization and application for TNT sensing were studied using a [Mo6Cl14]2– cluster. The synthesis of the molybdenum cluster was efficient and reproducible. The quenching of the molybdenum cluster fluorescence by nitroaromatic compound was described using the Stern–Volmer equation, obtaining a good fit in two concentration ranges. The obtained KSV values in both concentration ranges were similar or superior to those measured using other fluorescent sensors. Also, concentrations higher than 4 × 10–5 mM (0.01 mg L–1) of the TNT were possible to measure the quenching of the cluster fluorescence.

The DFT calculations indicate that the contribution of the TNT in the active lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals that are involved in the higher intensity transitions in the complex cluster–TNT are significant. This situation differs from all the luminescent [M6X8L6]2– clusters, where most of the closely spaced excited states are located in the {M6X8}q+ core. The interaction of TNT with molybdenum clusters was reported by theoretical and experimental methods. The TNT switches off the [Mo6Cl14]2– cluster luminescence.

The approach using a cluster fluorescence sensor has the potential to be a sensing technology for the detection of nitroaromatic explosives. The results obtained are promising, but in the future it will be necessary to evaluate the sensor capacity in real samples with other interferents.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from Fondecyt 1210827 and 11130007.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Szczepura L. F.; Edwards J. a.; Cedeño D. L. Luminescent Properties of Hexanuclear Molybdenum(II) Chloride Clusters Containing Thiolate Ligands. J. Clust. Sci. 2009, 20 (1), 105–112. 10.1007/s10876-008-0214-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kirakci K.; Kubát P.; Dušek M.; Fejfarová K.; Šícha V.; Mosinger J.; Lang K. A Highly Luminescent Hexanuclear Molybdenum Cluster - A Promising Candidate toward Photoactive Materials. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 2012 (19), 3107–3111. 10.1002/ejic.201200402. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ramirez-Tagle R.; Arratia-Pérez R. Electronic Structure and Molecular Properties of the [Mo6 × 8L6]2-; X = Cl, Br, I; L = F, Cl, Br, I Clusters. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 460 (4–6), 438–441. 10.1016/j.cplett.2008.06.035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ramirez-Tagle R.; Arratia-Pérez R. Pyridine as Axial Ligand on the [Mo6Cl8]4+ Core Switches off Luminescence. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2009, 475 (4–6), 232–234. 10.1016/j.cplett.2009.05.053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ramirez-Tagle R.; Arratia-Pérez R. The Luminescent [Mo6 × 8(NCS)6]2- (X = Cl, Br, I) Clusters?: A Computational Study Based on Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Including Spin-Orbit and Solvent-Polarity Effects. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 455 (1–3), 38–41. 10.1016/j.cplett.2008.02.037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ramírez-Tagle R.; Arratia-Pérez R. Electronic Structure and Molecular Properties of the Mixed Rhenium–Molybdenum [Re6-x Mo x S8(CN)6]Q-, (x = 0 to 6) Clusters. J. Clust. Sci. 2009, 20 (1), 159–164. 10.1007/s10876-008-0213-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Faizullin B. A.; Strelnik I. D.; Dayanova I. R.; Gerasimova T. P.; Kholin K. V.; Nizameev I. R.; Voloshina A. D.; Gubaidullin A. T.; Fedosimova S. V.; Mikhailov M. A.; et al. Structure Impact on Photodynamic Therapy and Cellular Contrasting Functions of Colloids Constructed from Dimeric Au(I) Complex and Hexamolybdenum Clusters. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 2021, 128 (May), 112355. 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Krasilnikova A. a.; Shestopalov M. a.; Brylev K. a.; Kirilova I. a.; Khripko O. P.; Zubareva K. E.; Khripko Y. I.; Podorognaya V. T.; Shestopalova L. V.; Fedorov V. E.; et al. Prospects of Molybdenum and Rhenium Octahedral Cluster Complexes as X-Ray Contrast Agents. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2015, 144, 13–17. 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2014.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cordier S.; Dorson F.; Grasset F.; Molard Y.; Fabre B.; Haneda H.; Sasaki T.; Mortier M.; Ababou-Girard S.; Perrin C. Novel Nanomaterials Based on Inorganic Molybdenum Octahedral Clusters. J. Clust. Sci. 2009, 20 (1), 9–21. 10.1007/s10876-008-0224-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ghosh R. N.; Askeland P. a.; Kramer S.; Loloee R. Optical Dissolved Oxygen Sensor Utilizing Molybdenum Chloride Cluster Phosphorescence. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98 (22), 221103. 10.1063/1.3595483. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ramírez-Tagle R.; Alvarado-Soto L.; Hernández-Acevedo L.; Arratia-Pérez R. Spin-Orbit and Solvent Effects in the Luminescent [Re6Q 8(NCS)6]4-, Q = S, Se, Te Clusters: Molecular Sensors and Molecular Devices. J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 2010, 55 (1), 39–43. 10.4067/S0717-97072010000100010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu R.; Luo Y.; Zheng Y.; Zhang G.; Streb C. Polyoxometalate-like Sub-Nanometer Molybdenum(vi)-Oxo Clusters for Sensitive, Selective and Stable H2O2sensing. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56 (66), 9465–9468. 10.1039/D0CC03758C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ponnu A.; Anslyn E. V. A Fluorescence-Based Cyclodextrin Sensor to Detect Nitroaromatic Explosives. Supramol. Chem. 2010, 22 (1), 65–71. 10.1080/10610270903378032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhu W.; Park J. S.; Sessler J. L.; Gaitas A. A Colorimetric Receptor Combined with a Microcantilever Sensor for Explosive Vapor Detection. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98 (12), 123501. 10.1063/1.3567011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Algarra M.; Campos B. B.; Miranda M. S.; da Silva J. C. G. E. CdSe Quantum Dots Capped PAMAM Dendrimer Nanocomposites for Sensing Nitroaromatic Compounds. Talanta 2011, 83 (5), 1335–1340. 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.10.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Khullar S.; Singh S.; Das P.; Mandal S. K. Luminescent Lanthanide-Based Probes for the Detection of Nitroaromatic Compounds in Water. ACS Omega 2019, 4 (3), 5283–5292. 10.1021/acsomega.9b00223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Qayyum M.; Bushra T.; Khan Z. A.; Gul H.; Majeed S.; Yu C.; Farooq U.; Shaikh A. J.; Shahzad S. A. Synthesis and Tetraphenylethylene-Based Aggregation-Induced Emission Probe for Rapid Detection of Nitroaromatic Compounds in Aqueous Media. ACS Omega 2021, 6 (39), 25447–25460. 10.1021/acsomega.1c03439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hay D. N. T.; Adams J. a.; Carpenter J.; DeVries S. L.; Domyancich J.; Dumser B.; Goldsmith S.; Kruse M. a.; Leone A.; Moussavi-Harami F.; et al. Facile Reduction of Early Transition Metal Halides with Nonconventional, Mild Reductants. 6. A New, Lower-Temperature, Solid-State Synthesis of the Cluster Hexamolybdenum Dodecachloride Mo6Cl12 from MoCl5, via Chloromolybdic Acid, (H3O)2[Mo6(M3-Cl)8Cl6]·6. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2004, 357 (3), 644–648. 10.1016/j.ica.2002.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Te Velde G.; Bickelhaupt F. M.; Baerends E. J.; Fonseca Guerra C.; van Gisbergen S. J. A.; Snijders J. G.; Ziegler T. Chemistry with ADF. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22 (9), 931–967. 10.1002/jcc.1056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. van Lenthe E.; Baerends E. J.; Snijders J. G. Relativistic Total Energy Using Regular Approximations. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101 (11), 9783–9792. 10.1063/1.467943. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Perdew J.; Chevary J.; Chevary J. a.; Perdew J. P.; Vosko S.; Jackson K.; Singh D. J.; Vosko S. H.; Pederson M.; Pederson M. R.; et al. Atoms, Molecules, Solids, and Surfaces: Applications of the Generalized Gradient Approximation for Exchange and Correlation. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 46, 6671. 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pye C. C.; Ziegler T.; van Lenthe E.; Louwen J. N. An Implementation of the Conductor-like Screening Model of Solvation within the Amsterdam Density Functional Package — Part II. COSMO for Real Solvents 1. Can. J. Chem. 2009, 87 (7), 790–797. 10.1139/V09-008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sheldon J. C. Polynuclear Complexes of Molybdenum(II). Nature 1959, 184 (4694), 1210–1213. 10.1038/1841210a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sheldon J. C. 208. Chloromolybdenum(II) Compounds. J. Chem. Soc. 1960, 1007–1014. 10.1039/jr9600001007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schäfer H.; Schnering H. -G. V.; Tillack J.; Kuhnen F.; Wöhrle H.; Baumann H. Neue Untersuchungen Über Die Chloride Des Molybdäns. ZAAC - J. Inorg. Gen. Chem. 1967, 353 (5–6), 281–310. 10.1002/zaac.19673530510. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dorman W. C.; McCarley R. E. Chemistry of the Polynuclear Metal Halides. XII. Preparation of Molybdenum and Tungsten M6 × 84+ Clusters by Reduction of Higher Halides in Molten Sodium Halide-Aluminum Halide Mixtures. Inorg. Chem. 1974, 13 (2), 491–493. 10.1021/ic50132a059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Koknat F. W.; Adaway T. J.; Erzerum S. I.; Syed S. Convenient Synthesis of the Hexanuclear Molybdenum(II) Halides Mo6Cl12 and Mo6Br12·2H2O. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. Lett. 1980, 16 (5), 307–310. 10.1016/0020-1650(80)80066-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Yang X.; Castleman A. W. Production and Magic Numbers of Large Hydrated Anion Clusters X-(H2O)N = 0–59 (X = Hydroxyl, Oxygen Atom or Molecule, and Ozone) under Thermal Conditions. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94 (23), 8500–8502. 10.1021/j100386a003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Achatz U.; Joos S.; Berg C.; Schindler T.; Beyer M.; Albert G.; Niedner-Schatteburg G.; Bondybey V. E. Acid-Base Catalyzed Reactions in Ionic Water Clusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120 (8), 1876–1882. 10.1021/ja971869t. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Prell J. S.; O’Brien J. T.; Williams E. R. Structural and Electric Field Effects of Ions in Aqueous Nanodrops. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133 (13), 4810–4818. 10.1021/ja108341t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Chaudhuri C.; Wang Y.-S.; Jiang J. C.; Lee Y. T.; Chang H.-C.; Niedner-Schatteburg G. Infrared Spectra and Isomeric Structures of Hydroxide Ion-Water Clusters OH- (H2O)1–5: A Comparison with H3O (H2O)1–5. Mol. Phys. 2001, 99 (14), 1161–1173. 10.1080/00268970110046312. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Robertson W. H.; Diken E. G.; Price E. A.; Shin J.-W.; Johnson M. A. Spectroscopic Determination of the OH- Solvation Shell in the OH-·(H2O)n Clusters. Science (80-.). 2003, 299 (5611), 1367–1372. 10.1126/science.1080695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Diken E. G.; Headrick J. M.; Roscioli J. R.; Bopp J. C.; Johnson M. A.; McCoy A. B. Fundamental Excitations of the Shared Proton in the H3O2- and H5O2+ Complexes. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109 (8), 1487–1490. 10.1021/jp044155v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. McCoy A. B.; Diken E. G.; Johnson M. A. Generating Spectra from Ground-State Wave Functions: Unraveling Anharmonic Effects in the OH-·H2O Vibrational Predissociation Spectrum. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113 (26), 7346–7352. 10.1021/jp811352c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Xantheas S. S. Theoretical Study of Hydroxide Ion-Water Clusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117 (41), 10373–10380. 10.1021/ja00146a023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lengyel J.; Beyer M. K. Infrared Spectroscopy of O À and OH À in Water Clusters: Evidence for Fast Interconversion between O À and OH OH À †. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 25346–25351. 10.1039/C7CP04577H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kirakci K.; Kubát P.; Langmaier J.; Polívka T.; Fuciman M.; Fejfarová K.; Lang K. A Comparative Study of the Redox and Excited State Properties of (NBu4N)2[Mo6 × 14] and (NBu4N)2[Mo6 × 8(CF3COO)6] (X = Cl, Br, or I). Dalton Trans. 2013, 42 (19), 7224–7232. 10.1039/c3dt32863e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Efremova O. A.; Vorotnikov Y. A.; Brylev K. A.; Vorotnikova N. A.; Novozhilov I. N.; Kuratieva N. V.; Edeleva M. V.; Benoit D. M.; Kitamura N.; Mironov Y. V.; Shestopalov M. A.; Sutherland A. J. Octahedral Molybdenum Cluster Complexes with Aromatic Sulfonate Ligands. Dalt. Trans. 2016, 45, 15427–15435. 10.1039/C6DT02863B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Meaney M. S.; McGuffin V. L. Luminescence-Based Methods for Sensing and Detection of Explosives. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008, 391 (7), 2557–2576. 10.1007/s00216-008-2194-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Chen X.; Lin J.; Zhuang Y.; Huang S.; Chen J.; Han Z. Dual-Mode Turn-on Ratiometric Fluorescence Sensor Based on Carbon Dots and CuInS2/ZnS Quantum Dots for Detection of Chlorotetracycline. Spectrochim. Acta - Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2022, 270, 120851. 10.1016/j.saa.2021.120851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Petdum A.; Kaewnok N.; Panchan W.; Charoenpanich A.; Sirirak J.; Sahasithiwat S.; Sooksimuang T.; Wanichacheva N. Novel Rapid “Turn on” Tetrahydro-[5]Helicene-Based Fluorescence Sensor for Selective Detection of Cd2+ with a Remarkable Large Stokes Shift and Its Applications in Food Samples and Living Cell. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2022, 423, 113578. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2021.113578. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang C.; O’Brien S.; Balogh L. Comparison and Stability of CdSe Nanocrystals Covered with Amphiphilic Poly(Amidoamine) Dendrimers. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106 (40), 10316–10321. 10.1021/jp014241k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Goodpaster J. V.; McGuffin V. L. Fluorescence Quenching as an Indirect Detection Method for Nitrated Explosives. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73 (9), 2004–2011. 10.1021/ac001347n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Campos B. B.; Algarra M.; Esteves Da Silva J. C. G. Fluorescent Properties of a Hybrid Cadmium Sulfide-Dendrimer Nanocomposite and Its Quenching with Nitromethane. J. Fluoresc. 2010, 20 (1), 143–151. 10.1007/s10895-009-0532-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Şen F. B.; Beǧiç N.; Bener M.; Apak R. Fluorescence Turn-off Sensing of TNT by Polyethylenimine Capped Carbon Quantum Dots. Spectrochim. Acta - Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2022, 271, 120884. 10.1016/j.saa.2022.120884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Dong W.; Ma Z.; Chen P.; Duan Q. Carbazole and Tetraphenylethylene Based AIE-Active Conjugated Polymer for Highly Sensitive TNT Detection. Mater. Lett. 2019, 236, 480–482. 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.10.162. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES