Table 2.
Basic information of primary anterior teeth and univariate analysis results.
| Factors | Censored | Failed | P∗ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 350 | 242 | 0.078 | |
| Gender | Boy | 191 | 128 | 0.278 |
| Girl | 160 | 113 | ||
| Attending doctors | Intern | 25 | 40 | 0.002 |
| Expert | 326 | 201 | ||
| Treatment method | GA | 278 | 150 | 0.001 |
| Non-GA | 73 | 91 | ||
| Periapical lesion | No | 278 | 154 | 0.000 |
| Yes | 73 | 87 | ||
| Root canal filling materials |
Iodoform zinc oxide paste | 245 | 138 | 0.015 |
| Vitapex® | 106 | 103 | ||
| Crown restoration materials | Resin filling | 338 | 243 | -a |
| GIC filling | 8 | 3 | ||
∗Analyzed by Cox regression analysis, and the bold P value indicated that the difference was significant (P < 0.05).
GA, general anesthesia; GIC, glass ionomer cement; non-GA, non-general anesthesia.
The difference in sample size between the two groups was large, and no statistical test was conducted.