Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 4;18(6):3718–3736. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00063

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Dependence of the constant interstate coupling Eij(0) (for ij) and the LE–CT energy gap (ΔECT–LE(0)) with different parameters of the PDI dimer: (a) Rπ, (b) Rs, (c) R, (d) α, (e) β (component along Rs), and (f) β (component along R). The scans were performed on the structure with Rπ = 4.0 Å, changing one parameter at time and setting all others to zero. Because several choices of ELE–CT(0) are possible, we specify that only the ELE–CT coupling between the states |L1⟩ and |CT(1 → 2⟩ is reported because it is larger in magnitude. By symmetry, the |L2⟩ and |CT(2 → 1⟩ coupling is the same.