Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 2;13:881404. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.881404

Table 2.

Effect of silver nanogel on excision wound model (percentage wound contraction) in albino Wistar rats.

Groups Days
5th (% contraction) 10th (% contraction) 15th (% contraction) 20th (% contraction)
Group A 33.22 ± 8.88 68.76 ± 21.95 87.14 ± 2.74 98.30 ±1.43
Group B 45.96 ± 8.66 69.10 ± 8.59 79.11 ± 10.59 94.23 ±6.65
Group C 38.06 ± 12.50 67.16 ± 17.81 79.88 ± 12.54 91.79 ± 10.77
Group D 29.70 ± 8.07 61.26 ± 11.18 80.38 ± 3.20 93.19 ± 4.53
Group E 14.32 ± 8.80 49.71 ± 15.83 84.76 ± 2.04 87.27 ± 3.64
Group F 27.42 ± 14.11 54.84 ± 8.87 80.31 ± 4.78 85.77 ± 7.45

Values (expressed in mean ± SD) tensile strength. Where, Group A: Test treatment group (Silver nanoparticles 0.1 mg g−1). Group B: Test treatment group (Silver nanoparticles 0.5 mg g−1). Group C: Test treatment group (Silver nanoparticles 1 mg g−1). Group D: Positive control (market drug silverex 0.2%). Group E: Group treated with gel base. Group F: Negative control (untreated group).

Bold values are of maximum contraction of wound as compared to other treatments.