Table 4.
Effect of silver nanogel on burn wound model (percentage wound contraction) in albino Wistar rats.
Groups | Days | ||
---|---|---|---|
5th (% contraction) |
10th (% contraction) |
15th (% contraction) |
|
Group A | 33.61 ± 16.80 | 60.61 ± 5.82 | 92.79 ± 0.68 |
Group B | 65.76 ± 30.15 | 82.13 ± 15.48 | 96.42 ±3.31 |
Group C | 75.35 ± 21.69 | 82.07 ± 15.87 | 98.60 ±2.41 |
Group D | 68.81 ± 27.02 | 81.23 ± 16.26 | 99.65 ± 0.60 |
Group E | 69.24 ± 27.52 | 82.51 ± 15.36 | 87.01 ± 4.73 |
Group F | 63.36 ± 31.78 | 68.59 ± 28.32 | 85.48 ± 15.99 |
Values (expressed in mean ± SD) wound contraction %. Where, Group A: Test treatment group (Silver nanoparticles 0.1 mg g−1). Group B: Test treatment group (Silver nanoparticles 0.5 mg g−1). Group C: Test treatment group (Silver nanoparticles 1 mg g−1). Group D: Positive control (market drug silverex 0.2%). Group E: Group treated with gel base. Group F: Negative control (untreated group).
Bold values are of maximum contraction of wound as compared to other treatments.