Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 15;17(1):641–658. doi: 10.1515/biol-2022-0067

Table 4.

Effect of SMF- and SAF-supplemented diets on body weight (g) of HFD-induced obese rats

Groups Baseline Induction phase Treatment phase
Day 0 (g) Day 42 (g) Day 63 (g) Day 84 (g)
Control 100.21 ± 0.11a 135.00 ± 11.26a 150.33 ± 10.06a 165.33 ± 3.51a
Induced and untreated 100.21 ± 0.11a 222.33 ± 12.50b 218.00 ± 20.22c 215.33 ± 12.50c
Standard 100.21 ± 0.11a 222.33 ± 12.50b 188.66 ± 40.66b 143.33 ± 45.72a
SMF 10% 100.21 ± 0.11a 222.33 ± 12.50b 191.33 ± 10.96bc 185.33 ± 6.35b
SMF 20% 100.21 ± 0.11a 222.33 ± 12.50b 211.03 ± 18.91c 172.66 ± 5.13ab
SMF 30% 100.21 ± 0.11a 222.33 ± 12.50b 200.18 ± 7.37c 150.33 ± 17.89a
SAF 10% 100.21 ± 0.11a 222.33 ± 12.50b 212.66 ± 7.17c 209.00 ± 10.00c
SAF 20% 100.21 ± 0.11a 222.33 ± 12.50b 200.20 ± 11.55c 181.00 ± 50.86b
SAF 30% 100.21 ± 0.11a 222.33 ± 12.50b 183.00 ± 8.50a 161.33 ± 0.10a
SMF 15% + SAF 15% 100.21 ± 0.11a 222.33 ± 12.50b 172.00 ± 05.00ab 135.33 ± 12.50a

The data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical analysis for data comparison using ANOVA was done by comparing the groups against the control (group 1). Values with the same “letter(s) superscript” are not significantly different (p > 0.05), while values with different “letter(s) superscripts” are significantly different (p < 0.05).