Table 2. Respective LSTM model topologies for each dataset.
| Dataset | Method | Input | Hidden layer 1 | Hidden layer 2 | Hidden layer 3 | Output | Sample length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canada | Hybrid | (126,1) | 16 | 8 | 4 | (1) | 14 |
| BiLSTM | (126,1) | 16 | 8 | 4 | (1) | 14 | |
| deBiLSTM | (126,1) | 16 | 8 | 4 | (1) | 14 | |
| France | Hybrid | (126,1) | 16 | 8 | 4 | (1) | 14 |
| BiLSTM | (126,1) | 16 | 8 | 4 | (1) | 14 | |
| deBiLSTM | (126,1) | 16 | 8 | 4 | (1) | 14 | |
| Japan | Hybrid | (126,1) | 32 | 16 | 8 | (1) | 5 |
| BiLSTM | (126,1) | 32 | 16 | 8 | (1) | 5 | |
| deBiLSTM | (126,1) | 32 | 16 | 8 | (1) | 5 | |
| Mexico | Hybrid | (126,1) | 64 | 32 | 16 | (1) | 24 |
| BiLSTM | (126,1) | 64 | 32 | 16 | (1) | 24 | |
| deBiLSTM | (126,1) | 64 | 32 | 16 | (1) | 24 | |
| Brazil | Hybrid | (126,1) | 8 | 8 | 4 | (1) | 5 |
| BiLSTM | (126,1) | 8 | 8 | 4 | (1) | 5 | |
| deBiLSTM | (126,1) | 8 | 8 | 4 | (1) | 5 | |
| Turkey | Hybrid | (126,1) | 16 | 8 | 4 | (1) | 14 |
| BiLSTM | (126,1) | 16 | 8 | 4 | (1) | 14 | |
| deBiLSTM | (126,1) | 16 | 8 | 4 | (1) | 14 | |
| Italy | Hybrid | (126,1) | 32 | 16 | 8 | (1) | 5 |
| BiLSTM | (126,1) | 32 | 16 | 8 | (1) | 5 | |
| deBiLSTM | (126,1) | 32 | 16 | 8 | (1) | 5 |