Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 16;107(7):1812–1824. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac088

Table 1.

Summary intervention trials that altered growth hormone and studied the impact on nonalcoholic fatty liver/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis endpoints

Author Condition NAFLD/NASH status Design/intervention Number of Subjects Duration NAFLD-related endpointsa Glucose-related exclusion criteria Glucose/insulin-related endpoints and discontinuations
Hypopituitary studies
 Nishizawa et al (30) Hypopituitary GHD Unselected for NAFLD Open label daily GH 19 6 months ALT improved
 Nishizawa et al (30) Hypopituitary GHD NASH (subset of above) Open label daily GH 5 6-12 months Improved histologic steatosis and fibrosis
 Meienberg et al (31) Hypopituitary GHD Unselected for NAFLD Daily GH vs no treatment 18 (9 GH, 9 untreated) 6 months No difference in absolute % ∆IHL No difference in Δ FPG, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR or HbA1c
Acromegaly studies
 Bredella, et al (32) Active acromegaly Unselected for NAFLD Biochemical control 16 mean 8 months (3-22 months) Increase in IHL by lipid/water ratio Improved HOMA-IR, fasting insulin & OGTT insulin AUC; no ∆ in FPG or OGTT glucose AUC
 Reyes-Vidal et al (33) Active acromegaly Unselected for NAFLD Biochemical control s/p TSS 23 (12 with 1H-MRS) 0.5-2 years Increase in IHL Improved FPG and HOMA-IR
 Winhofer et al (34) Active acromegaly Unselected for NAFLD Biochemical control s/p TSS 7 6 months No change in absolute % IHL T2DM Improved fasting insulin; no change in FPG or mean OGTT glucose
 Madsen et al (35) Acromegaly controlled on SSA Unselected for NAFLD Randomized: continue SSA vs PEG + reduced dose SSA 18 (6 SSA, 12 PEG + SSA) 6 months Increase in % IHL and ALT in PEG + SSA vs SSA group No difference in ΔHOMA-IR
 Kuker et al (36) Active acromegaly Unselected for NAFLD Initiation of PEG therapy 21 mean 5.7 years (1-13.4 years) Increase in % IHL with PEG: 1.8% to 3.0%, P = 0.04 Improved HOMA-IR, QUICKI and HbA1c with PEG
Obesity studies
 Pan et al (37) Young adults (18-29 years) with obesity and NAFLD NAFLD (≥5% IHL by 1H-MRS) Randomized, open-label daily GH vs no treatment 24 (13 GH) 6 months No difference in ∆  % IHL or Δ ALT; NAFLD resolution (<5% IHL): 5/9 GH vs 1/9 no treatment T2DM or any antidiabetic medications No difference in FPG or OGTT 2hPG. Discontinuations: no subject met drop criteria (FPG > 126 mg/dL or OGTT 2hPG > 200 mg/dL).
 Bredella et al (38) Adult men (18-45 years), BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and abdominal fat Unselected for NAFLD Randomized, double-blind: daily GH vs placebo 62 (32 GH) 6 months Decrease in IHL by ∆ in lipid/water ratio when controlled for ∆ weight T2DM, FPG ≥ 126 mg/dL, OGTT 2hPG ≥200 mg/dL Increase in OGTT 2hPG in GH vs pbo; no difference in FPG, HbA1c or HOMA-IR. Discontinuations: 5 subjects met drop criteria, including 2 GH with FPG ≥ 126 mg/dL, 1 GH and 1 placebo with OGTT 2h PG ≥ 200 mg/dL, and 1 GH with HbA1c ≥ 6.5%.
HIV and NAFLD studies
 Stanley et al (39) Adults (18-65 years) with HIV and abdominal fat Unselected for NAFLD Randomized, double-blind: daily tesamorelin vs placebo 54 (28 tesamorelin) 6 months Decrease in IHL in tesamorelin group; absolute net treatment effect -2.9%, P = 0.003 FPG ≥ 126 mg/dL or use of antidiabetic meds Increased HbA1c; no effect on FPG, OGTT 2hPG, fasting insulin or HOMA-IR; euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp (n = 24): IS decreased at 3 months, no longer significant at 6 months. Four subjects met hyperglycemia criteria: n = 1 per group with FPG ≥ 126 mg/dL and n =1 per group with OGTT 2hPG ≥ 200 mg/dL. No subjects met discontinuation criteria of FPG ≥ 150 mg/dL.
 Stanley et al (40) Adults (18-70 years) with HIV and NAFLD NAFLD (≥5% IHL by 1H-MRS) Randomized, double-blind: daily tesamorelin vs placebo 61 (31 tesamorelin) 12 months Decrease in IHL in tesamorelin vs placebo group: absolute net treatment effect −4.1% (−7.6% to 0.7%), P < 0.02; no treatment effect on ALT T2DM unless HbA1c ≤ 7% on stable antidiabetic meds (≥6 months) and no insulin or TZDs. Tesamorelin group had 12.9% with T2DM and 9.7% on antidiabetic meds at baseline; similar rates in placebo group. No treatment effect on FPG or HbA1c. Number meeting hyperglycemia criteria (FPG ≥ 126 mg/dL) were similar in tesamorelin (12/31) vs placebo (11/30) groups. Two subjects in tesamorelin met discontinuation criteria: 1 FPG > 150 mg/dL (non-T2DM drop) and 1 FPG > 180 mg/dL (T2DM drop).

Abbreviations: 1H-MRS, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy; 2hPG, 2-hour plasma glucose; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AUC, area under the curve; BMI, body mass index; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; GHD, growth hormone deficiency; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin A1c; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; IHL, intrahepatic lipid; IS, insulin sensitivity; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; PEG, pegvisomant; QUICKI, Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index; SSA, somatostatin analog; s/p TSS, status post transsphenoidal surgery; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; TZD, thiazolidinediones.

aSteatosis endpoints by 1H-MRS unless otherwise noted.