Skip to main content
. 2017 May 2;145(10):2003–2010. doi: 10.1017/S0950268817000784

Table 2.

Overview of participant characteristics and Odds Ratios from the univariate analysis for the probability of ESBL carriage

Characteristics of participants Frequency OR (95% CI)
Total ESBL carriers Non-ESBL carriers
Exposure group in slaughter process (n = 328)
‘Higher exposure’ group 95 10 85 4·45 (1·57–12·62)
‘Lower exposure’ group 233 6 227 Ref.
Age (mean) (n = 328) 39·8 38·1 (n = 16) 39·9 (n = 312) 0·99 (0·94–1·03)*
Gender (n = 324)
Male 276 14 262 2·51 (0·32–19·54)
Female 48 1 47 Ref.
Nationality (n = 305)
Non-Dutch 245 12 233 0·98 (0·27–3·58)
Dutch 60 3 57 Ref.
Consumption of raw meat (n = 294)
Yes 106 4 102 0·70 (0·21–2·28)
No 188 10 178 Ref.
Hospitalization in the past 12 months (n = 295)
Yes 32 2 30 1·28 (0·28–5·96)
No 263 13 250 Ref.
Use of antimicrobials in the past 12 months (n = 323)
Yes 48 3 45 1·34 (0·37–4·90)
No 275 13 262 Ref.
Living on a farm (n = 297)
Yes 17 0 17 NE
No 280 13 267
Travelling in the past 12 months (n = 311)
Yes 216 7 209 0·36 (0·13–1·04)
No 95 8 87 Ref.
Smoking (n = 321)
Yes 140 3 137 0·31 (0·09–1·12)
No 181 12 169 Ref.

Ref., Reference category; NE, Not estimated due to empty cells.

*

Per 1 year increase.

Not from the Netherlands: Cape Verdean (n = 1), Ghanese (n = 1), Hungarian (n = 46), Latvian (n = 3), Polish (n = 119), Portugese (n = 12), Romanian (n = 41), Slovakian (n = 20), Turkish (n = 2).