Skip to main content
. 2000 Apr;66(4):1668–1675. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.4.1668-1675.2000

TABLE 2.

Diversity indices calculated from LH-PCR and FAME data

Method Site Richnessa Evennessb Diversityc
LH-PCR A 20.0 ± 0.0cd 0.91 ± 0.01b 2.73 ± 0.02c
B 19.3 ± 0.5d 0.90 ± 0.01c 2.65 ± 0.04d
C1 22.0 ± 0.0b 0.91 ± 0.01b 2.80 ± 0.02b
C2 23.0 ± 0.0a 0.92 ± 0.00a 2.90 ± 0.01a
FAME A 34.0 ± 0.8a 0.85 ± 0.00a 3.00 ± 0.02a
B 30.5 ± 2.9b 0.83 ± 0.02b 2.82 ± 0.09b
C1 31.8 ± 1.0ab 0.86 ± 0.00a 2.96 ± 0.02a
C2 32.4 ± 1.0ab 0.85 ± 0.01a 2.96 ± 0.02a
a

Richness is equal to the number of LH-PCR or FAME peaks. 

b

Evenness is equal to diversity/ln (richness). 

c

Diversity (Shannon index) (H) was calculated as follows: H = −Σpiln(pi), where pi is the relative abundance of a given LH-PCR or FAME peak. 

d

Values are means ± standard deviations (n = 4). For each index, different letters indicate that values for different sites determined by the same method were significantly different (P < 0.05), as determined by one-way analysis of variance and least significant difference.