Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 17;4(3):dlac061. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac061

Table 1.

Broth microdilution MIC testing of lincosamide antibiotics against L. monocytogenes, E. faecalis and B. subtilis strains

Species/strain Antibiotic MIC, mg/L
lincomycin clindamycin iboxamycin
L. monocytogenes 10403S 4–8 2 0.125–0.25
L. monocytogenes EDG-e 8 1–2 0.125–0.5
L. monocytogenes EDG-e Δlmo0919 0.25–1 0.125–0.5 0.0625
E. faecalis ΔlsaA pCIEspec 0.125 0.125 0.0625
E. faecalis ΔlsaA pCIEspec LsaA 16–32 16 0.5
B. subtilis WT 168 80 4 2
B. subtilis ΔvmlR 2.5 0.125 0.06
B. subtilis ΔvmlR thrC::Phy-spank-vmlR (IPTG: 1 mM) 160 8 4
B. subtilis thrC::Phy-spank-cfr (IPTG: 1 mM) >640 640 16–32
B. subtilis ΔvmlR thrC::Phy-spank-cfr (IPTG: 1 mM) >640 320 2

In the case of L. monocytogenes strains, MIC testing was carried out in MH-F broth and growth inhibition was scored after 48 h incubation at 37°C. E. faecalis MIC testing was carried out in BHI broth supplemented with 2 mg/mL kanamycin (to prevent lsa revertants), 0.1 mg/mL spectinomycin (to maintain the pCIEspec plasmid) and 100 ng/mL of cCF10 peptide (to induce expression of LsaA protein). B. subtilis MIC testing was carried out in either LB medium or LB supplemented with 1 mM IPTG to induce expression of either VmlR or Cfr protein, and growth inhibition was scored after 16–20 h at 37°C. The MIC experiments were performed as three (L. monocytogenes strains) or two (B. subtilis and E. faecalis strains) biological replicates.