Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 17;12:10215. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14519-w

Table 1.

Comparison of diagnostic performances of the AI-based software for subsets (A)–(C).

Sensitivity p-value Specificity p-value PPV p-value NPV p-value Accuracy p-value
(A) Including all lesions 67.2 (62.2–72.1) 91.1 (89.9–92.4) 57.7 (52.9–62.5) 93.9 (92.8–95) 87.5 (86.1–88.8)
(B) Excluding cardiomegaly 65.4 (60.4–70.4) 0.014 93.9 (92.8–94.9)  < 0.001 65.8 (60.8–70.8)  < 0.001 93.8 (92.7–94.9) 0.310 89.5 (88.3–90.8)  < 0.001
(C) Excluding cardiomegaly and children ≤ 2 years old 86.4 (80.5–92.2)  < 0.001¥ 97.9 (97.1–98.7)  < 0.001¥ 79.7 (73.1–86.3)  < 0.001¥ 98.7 (98.1–99.3)  < 0.001¥ 96.9 (96.0–97.8)  < 0.001¥

Values are presented in percentages (%) with 95% confidence intervals.

Comparison between subset (A) and (B). ¥Comparison between subset (B) and (C).

CI confidence interval, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value.