TABLE II.
Pressure Error Parameter Alpha For Membrane Hydrophones
| Pressure | Compressional | Rarefactional | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data | Simulation | Simulation | Previous Simulation | Expt | Simulation | Simulation | Previous Simulation | Expt | |||
| Method | AF-SC | SB-SC | AF-SC | AF-SC | SB-SC | AF-SC | |||||
| Linearity | σq | σm | SI | αc (RMSD) | αc (RMSD) | αc (RMSD) | αc (RMSD) | αr (RMSD) | αr (RMSD) | αr (RMSD) | αr (RMSD) |
| Linear | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.24 (3%) | 0.25 (4%) | 0.29 (7%) | 0.24 (3%) | 0.25 (4%) | 0.30 (7%) | ||
| Nonlinear | 0.5 | 0.4 | 4% | 0.31 (3%) | 0.33 (4%) | 0.34 (4%) | 0.20 (3%) | 0.22 (3%) | 0.25 (4%) | ||
| Nonlinear | 1.0 | 0.8 | 12% | 0.40 (3%) | 0.43 (4%) | 0.43 (4%) | 0.40 (8%) | 0.20 (3%) | 0.21 (4%) | 0.23 (4%) | 0.29 (6%) |
| Nonlinear | 2.0 | 1.6 | 29% | 0.65 (5%) | 0.65 (5%) | 0.68 (5%) | 0.20 (3%) | 0.21 (4%) | 0.23 (4%) | ||
| Nonlinear | 3.0 | 2.2 | 35% | 0.76 (4%) | 0.72 (5%) | 0.20 (3%) | 0.23 (5%) | ||||
| Nonlinear | 4.0 | 3.1 | 45% | 0.87 (4%) | 0.84 (5%) | 0.19 (3%) | 0.24 (5%) | ||||
| Nonlinear | 5.0 | 3.9 | 49% | 0.95 (4%) | 1.01 (4%) | 1.02 (5%) | 0.18 (3%) | 0.23 (3%) | 0.23 (4%) | ||
Exponentially decaying model functions, exp(-αx), were fit to focal pressure magnitude ratios p’/p (where p’ = measured value subjected to spatial averaging and p = true axial value that would be obtained with a hypothetical point hydrophone), where x = dg / (λ1F/#). Nonlinearity indexes are σq (local distortion parameter), σm (nonlinear propagation parameter), and SI (spectral index). RMSD: root-mean-squared difference between data and functional fits. AF-SC: analytic filter spatial convolution. SB-SC: scan-based spatial convolution. Previous simulation data are from Wear et al., IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferro., Freq. Control., 67(12), 2674–2691, 2020.