Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 16;22:235. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01801-2

Table 3.

Log-regression of the HBM, TPB and TCSB predicting CCS intention

OR 95 CI P value OR 95 CI P value OR 95 CI P value OR 95 CI P value
Health insurance 1.85 1.21–2.84 0.004 1.79 1.16–2.77 0.008 1.85 1.20–2.86 0.005 1.98 1.26–3.09 0.003
Healthcare-expenditure decision making 2.27 1.48–3.47  < 0.001 2.05 1.31–3.20 0.002 2.02 1.28–3.17 0.002 1.82 1.15–2.87 0.009
Accessibility to screening centre 2.97 1.84–4.82  < 0.001 2.8 1.71–4.60  < 0.001 2.88 1.76–4.69  < 0.001 2.74 1.66–4.51  < 0.001
Health literacy 1.85 1.22–2.83 0.004 1.57 1.01–2.44 0.043 1.57 1.01–2.45 0.04 1.6 1.02–2.51 0.04
Knowledge about screening test 3.76 1.65–8.58 0.002 3.12 1.33–7.30 0.009 3.38 1.46–7.81 0.004 3.37 1.45–7.82 0.005
Perceived susceptibility 1.03 1.91–1.17 0.55
Perceived severity 0.91 0.80–1.05 0.23
Perceived benefits 1.21 1.07–1.36 0.002
Perceived barriers 0.95 0.92–0.98 0.006
Perceived self-efficacy 0.98 0.91–1.05 0.596
Attitude 0.88 0.81–0.96 0.007
Perceived subjective norm 0.97 0.88–1.07 0.59
Perceived behavioural control 1 0.96–1.04 0.94
Affect 0.84 0.75–0.94 0.003
Utility 1.2 1.07–1.35 0.002
Subjective norm 0.97 0.89–1.06 0.58
Habit 0.78 0.53–1.15 0.21

Model 1: R2 = 0.158,R2(adj) = 0.150, Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test: χ2 = 1.694, df = 5, p = 0.89

Model 2: R2 = 0.192,R2(adj) = 0.178, Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test: χ2 = 4.61, df = 8, p = 0.79

Model 3: R2 = 0.182, R2 (adj) = 0.171, Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test: χ2 = 8.6 df = 8, p = 0.37

Model 4: R2 = 0.201, R2 (adj) = 0.188, Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test: χ2 = 15.49, df = 8, p = 0.05