Table 3.
Log-regression of the HBM, TPB and TCSB predicting CCS intention
OR | 95 CI | P value | OR | 95 CI | P value | OR | 95 CI | P value | OR | 95 CI | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Health insurance | 1.85 | 1.21–2.84 | 0.004 | 1.79 | 1.16–2.77 | 0.008 | 1.85 | 1.20–2.86 | 0.005 | 1.98 | 1.26–3.09 | 0.003 |
Healthcare-expenditure decision making | 2.27 | 1.48–3.47 | < 0.001 | 2.05 | 1.31–3.20 | 0.002 | 2.02 | 1.28–3.17 | 0.002 | 1.82 | 1.15–2.87 | 0.009 |
Accessibility to screening centre | 2.97 | 1.84–4.82 | < 0.001 | 2.8 | 1.71–4.60 | < 0.001 | 2.88 | 1.76–4.69 | < 0.001 | 2.74 | 1.66–4.51 | < 0.001 |
Health literacy | 1.85 | 1.22–2.83 | 0.004 | 1.57 | 1.01–2.44 | 0.043 | 1.57 | 1.01–2.45 | 0.04 | 1.6 | 1.02–2.51 | 0.04 |
Knowledge about screening test | 3.76 | 1.65–8.58 | 0.002 | 3.12 | 1.33–7.30 | 0.009 | 3.38 | 1.46–7.81 | 0.004 | 3.37 | 1.45–7.82 | 0.005 |
Perceived susceptibility | 1.03 | 1.91–1.17 | 0.55 | |||||||||
Perceived severity | 0.91 | 0.80–1.05 | 0.23 | |||||||||
Perceived benefits | 1.21 | 1.07–1.36 | 0.002 | |||||||||
Perceived barriers | 0.95 | 0.92–0.98 | 0.006 | |||||||||
Perceived self-efficacy | 0.98 | 0.91–1.05 | 0.596 | |||||||||
Attitude | 0.88 | 0.81–0.96 | 0.007 | |||||||||
Perceived subjective norm | 0.97 | 0.88–1.07 | 0.59 | |||||||||
Perceived behavioural control | 1 | 0.96–1.04 | 0.94 | |||||||||
Affect | 0.84 | 0.75–0.94 | 0.003 | |||||||||
Utility | 1.2 | 1.07–1.35 | 0.002 | |||||||||
Subjective norm | 0.97 | 0.89–1.06 | 0.58 | |||||||||
Habit | 0.78 | 0.53–1.15 | 0.21 |
Model 1: R2 = 0.158,R2(adj) = 0.150, Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test: χ2 = 1.694, df = 5, p = 0.89
Model 2: R2 = 0.192,R2(adj) = 0.178, Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test: χ2 = 4.61, df = 8, p = 0.79
Model 3: R2 = 0.182, R2 (adj) = 0.171, Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test: χ2 = 8.6 df = 8, p = 0.37
Model 4: R2 = 0.201, R2 (adj) = 0.188, Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test: χ2 = 15.49, df = 8, p = 0.05