Abstract
A novel process is described for the synthesis of di- and trisubstituted cyclohexenes from an arene. These compounds are prepared from three independent nucleophilic addition reactions to a phenyl sulfone (PhSO2R; R = Me, Ph, NC4H8) dihapto-coordinated to the tungsten complex {WTp(NO)(PMe3)}(Tp = trispyrazolylborate). Such coordination renders the dearomatized aryl ring susceptible to protonation at a carbon ortho to the sulfone group. The resulting arenium species readily reacts with the first nucleophile to form a dihapto-coordinated sulfonylated diene complex. This complex can again be protonated, and subsequent nucleophilic addition forms a trisubstituted cyclohexene species bearing a sulfonyl group at an allylic position. Loss of the sulfinate anion forms a π-allyl species, to which a third nucleophile can be added. The trisubstituted cyclohexene can then be oxidatively decomplexed, either before or after substitution of the sulfonyl group. Nucleophiles employed include masked enolates, cyanide, amines, amides, and hydride, with all three additions occurring to the same face of the ring, anti to the metal. Of the twelve novel functionalized cyclohexenes prepared as examples of this methodology, nine compounds meet five independent criteria for evaluating drug likeliness. Structural assignments are supported with nine crystal structures, DFT studies, and full 2D NMR analysis.
Graphical Abstract

INTRODUCTION
As medicinal chemists seek to expand the structural complexity of molecular libraries through their efforts in diversity-oriented synthesis [DOS],1 new synthetic methods are desired that access underrepresented regions of druggable chemical space.2, 3 Carbocycles are considered to be ideal scaffolds for polar substituents in biologically active molecules,4–6 with the most common being six-membered rings.4 Here we report a potentially valuable new platform for discovery chemists: The syntheses of highly functionalized cyclohexenes are described accommodating fragments of esters, nitriles, amides, nitrogen heterocycles, and sulfones, functional groups that are ubiquitous in pharmaceuticals. These molecules are assembled without the aid of precious metals or organohalides.
A valuable tool for accessing six-member alicyclic molecules is dearomatization of functionalized benzenes.7–11 Over the years, our group has focused on a global dearomatization strategy in which a benzene is bound through two of its carbons to a π-basic metal fragment ({Os(NH3)5}2+,12 {ReTp(CO)(MeIm)},13 {MoTp(NO)-(DMAP)},7, 13 {WTp(NO)(PMe3)}).7 Such action activates the unbound portion of the benzene ring toward electrophilic addition and cycloaddition reactions.
While we have conducted several studies on arenes bearing π-donor groups,14–23 it was not until recently that organic manipulations of electron-deficient η2-benzene complexes were explored.24, 25 Most functional groups that are electron-withdrawing (e.g., benzoates, benzonitrile, phenones) have π-bonds that compete with the aromatic ring for metal coordination.26, 27 However, in the complexes MoTp(NO)(DMAP)(η2-trifluorotoluene) and WTp(NO)(PMe3)(η2-trifluorotoluene), the metal binds exclusively to the benzene ring.24, 25, 28 Despite the electron-withdrawing nature of the CF3 group, protonation of the η2-trifluorotoluene ligand can be achieved, ortho to the CF3 group. The resulting η2-benzenium complex then undergoes reaction with a nucleophile at an adjacent ring carbon, resulting in a 1,5-disubstituted η2-1,3-cyclohexadiene complex (Scheme 1). The η2-diene complex can then undergo another protonation/nucleophilic addition sequence to provide a trisubstituted cyclohexene containing up to three new stereocenters.24
Scheme 1.

Reactivity pattern of a dihapto-coordinated trifluorotoluene complex.
A recent study evaluated the scope and binding selectivity of complexes prepared from other electron-deficient arenes.29 That investigation revealed that sulfones were well-tolerated by the {WTp(NO)(PMe3)} fragment. Sulfones and sulfonamides are attractive functional groups to leverage in the dearomatization of benzene. Sulfur is the third most common heteroatom in marketed pharmaceuticals behind nitrogen and oxygen.30, 31 Further, sulfones and sulfonamides are prevalent in a variety of antibiotics, cancer therapeutics, COX-2 inhibitors, diuretics, and ulcer preventitives.31, 32 We postulated that the reactivity of η2-phenyl sulfone complexes would follow a reaction pattern similar to their trifluorotoluene analog. Further, unlike the CF3 group, sulfinates (:SO2R−) can act as leaving groups for nucleophilic substitution and elimination reactions.24, 33–40 The replacement of the sulfonyl group by other substituents could significantly expand the diversity of the anticipated trisubstituted cyclohexene products beyond sulfone and sulfonamide derivatives (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2.

Proposed syntheses of functionalized cyclohexenes from sulfones (R = Me, Ph) or sulfonamides (R = NC4H8).
RESULTS and DISCUSSION
Complexes of the form WTp(NO)(PMe3)(3,4-η2-PhSO2R) (R= −Me (2), −Ph (4), −NC4H8 (3)) were prepared by ligand exchange from the precursor complex WTp(NO)(PMe3)(η2-anisole) (1; Scheme 3).28 The diphenyl sulfone complex 4 exists in solution as an equilibrium ratio of coordination diastereomers (cdr = 1.7 : 1), differing by which face of the prochiral ring is coordinated. This interconversion of diastereomers (e.g., 4a and 4b) is assumed to occur via a C-H oxidative-addition/reductive-elimination mechanism.29 The sulfonamide derivative 3 similarly equilibrates in solution, with a cdr of 2 : 1. However, the methyl phenyl sulfone ligand exchange reaction yielded three isomers of 2 in a ratio of 2.7 : 2.5 : 1. The ring-bound isomers 2a and 2b partially precipitate out of the reaction mixture if the ligand exchange is conducted in THF solvent (Figure 1).29 The minor component of the mixture (2c) was determined to be a tungsten hydride species that is formed as a result of the metal inserting into the methyl C-H bond.29 The proposed hydride 2c has distinguishing spectroscopic features that include a diastereotopic methylene group with resonances at 3.14 and 1.88 ppm, and a corresponding hydride signal at 9.03 ppm, characterized by a JPH = 114.9 Hz and 183W satellites (JWH=9.3 Hz). To further support the assignment of 2c as an alkyl hydride, the anisole complex 1 was also combined with dimethyl sulfone and 4-(methylsulfonyl)toluene to yield 5 and 6 (Scheme 3), respectively. In both cases, the only complex formed was the expected sulfonylmethyl hydride, the net product of a tungsten insertion into the methyl CH bond. Previously, the {WTp(NO)(PMe3)} system has been observed to insert into N-H,19 O-H,26 C-H,41 and C-F42 bonds, but to our knowledge this is the first example we have encountered involving an sp3 carbon. We note, however, that seminal work by the Legzdins group includes many such examples for the {WCp*(NO)} system.43, 44
Scheme 3.

Preparation of dihapto-coordinated phenyl sulfone complexes of {WTp(NO)(PMe3)} and the C-H insertion of methyl sulfones (insert).
Figure 1.

SC-XRD molecular structure determination (50% ellipsoids) of the η2-phenyl methyl sulfone complex (2a; full report in SI of reference 29).
Previous work with the WTp(NO)(PMe3)(η2-trifluorotoluene) complex demonstrated that even though η2-arene complexes with electron-deficient benzenes exhibit poor coordination diastereoselectivity, protonation of the isomeric mixture at −30 °C followed by treatment with a nucleophile such as a cyanide ion (NaCN) results in the formation of a single diastereomer of an η2-diene complex.24 Disappointingly, when the methyl phenyl sulfone complex 2 was protonated (HOTf/CH3CN) and then treated with NaCN at −30 °C, two products (18a, 18b; Table 1, Scheme 4) were formed in roughly a 1 : 2 ratio. Repeating this reaction at room temperature predictably led to a mixture of decomposition products. However, when the reaction was performed at 0 °C a dominant product (18b, dr > 20 : 1; later referred to as 18) could be isolated. When the nucleophile was changed from NaCN to either of the masked ester enolates 1-methoxy-1-trimethylsilyloxy-2-methylpropene (MMTP) or 1-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy)-1-methoxyethene (TSME), the ratio of the diene complexes (10b : 10a; 13b : 13a) at −30 °C was close to 2:1, but again this ratio improved to > 20 : 1 at 0 °C (Table 1). Finally, when a 1H NMR spectrum was taken (SI) after the addition of acid to 2 at 0 °C (CD3CN), one dominant complex (7b) was observed that quickly degraded in solution. Key spectroscopic features were similar to those reported for the η2-arenium species [WTp(NO)(PMe3)(η2-HC6H5CF3)]+, derived from α,α,α-trifluorotoluene.24 Taken together, these data indicate that two different η2-arenium diastereomers (7–9a; 7–9b; Scheme 4) evolve upon protonation of 2 at −30 °C, each derived from a different stereoisomer of the initial arene complex. These arenium species then react with the nucleophile to give two different diene products (e.g., 18a and 18b). Repeating the cyanide addition with the other two sulfone derivatives (3, 4) gave similar results, providing diene complexes 19 and 20 respectively. These results are summarized in Scheme 4 and Table 1.
Table 1.
Temperature dependence of first nucleophilic addition to η2-arenium complex.
| Nu1 | R | Temperature (°C) | Ratio (b:a) |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMTP | Me (10) | −300 | 1.7:1>20:1 |
| TSME | Me (13) | −300 | 2:1>20:1 |
| NaCN | Me (18) | −300 | 2:1>20:1 |
| NaCN | Ph (19) | −300 | 1:1>20:1 |
| NaCN | NC4H8 (20) | −300 | 2:1>20:1 |
Scheme 4.

Protonation of dihapto-coordinated phenyl sulfone ligands followed by nucleophilic addition to generate sulfonylated diene complexes (racemic mixtures).
2D NMR techniques were used to characterize the diene complexes 10, 11b, 13b and 18–20b, and in all cases, NOE correlations between the protons of the pyrazole ring trans to the PMe3 ligand and the methine proton of C5 support the conclusion that the nucleophile adds adjacent to the site of arene protonation, and to the face of the bound carbocycle anti to metal coordination. In a similar fashion, other nucleophiles could be selectively added to the η2-arenium intermediates 7b–9b including MMTP lithium dimethyl malonate (LiDMM), tetrabutylammonium borohydride (TBAB), and imidazole, all of which react with the η2-arenium complexes 7b–9b (prepared in situ) to form η2-(1-sulfonyl-1,3-diene) complexes (10–23) with high levels of regio- and stereocontrol (Table 2; dr > 20:1)).
Table 2.
Tandem protonation/nucleophilic addition to η2-phenyl sulfone complexes (T = 0 °C).
|
Single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies (SC-XRD; e.g., Figure 2; see SI) provided molecular structures of the diene complexes 11 and 14–17, all of which are consistent with the assigned stereochemistries.29 We posit that the high diastereoselectivity (dr >20:1) observed for these diene complexes at 0°C (Table 2 10–23) is the result of the reversible isomerization for the η2-arene coordination diastereomers (Table 1, a and b) coupled with a greater thermodynamic driving force to form arenium isomer b (e.g., 7a → 7b: ΔG = −3.0 kcal/mol; SI). This is analogous to that reported for trifluorotoluene.24
Figure 2.

SC-XRD molecular structure determination (50% ellipsoids; mirror image) of the sulfonamide-substituted η2-diene complex 14.
The products resulting from the 1,2-addition reactions of the η2-phenyl sulfones are rare examples of conjugated η2-diene complexes. The uncoordinated sp2 carbons are in conjugation with the tungsten dπ orbital, and these complexes are expected to have a basic carbon at the terminus the diene.24, 45 Protonation of dienes 10, 11, and 13 at −30 °C cleanly yield the η2-allyl complexes 24, 25, and 27). This type of allyl distortion, in which only two of the three allyl carbons are strongly coordinated by the metal is typical for complexes of the form [WTp(NO)(PMe3)(π-allyl)]+ (vide infra).46 Calculations indicate that having the weakly coordinated carbon (indicated as a carbocation in Scheme 5) distal to the PMe3 is favored by ~3 kcal/mole over the proximal allyl conformer (a) for the parent cyclohexadienium species (SI).46 This inherent preference also avoids placing the carbocation-like allyl carbon next to the electron-withdrawing SO2R group (a in Scheme 5). NOE correlations between the methine group bound to the sulfone and the PMe3 group, along with stereochemical determinations of subsequently derived products (vide infra) support the notion that the sulfone group is oriented trans to tungsten. NMR data for 24 – 27 are consistent with what is reported for the trifluorotoluene-derived analogs.24 As seen with the latter, we suspect that although protonation of the η2-diene complex under kinetic control likely occurs anti to the metal (a in Scheme 5),41, 47 such an action creates a steric interaction between the sulfone and the PMe3 and NO ligands. Subsequent deprotonation followed by protonation syn to the metal would provide the observed stereochemistry in which the sulfone group is anti to the metal. In contrast to the sulfonylated diene complexes, attempts to convert the sulfonamide-diene 12 to the corresponding allyl (26 in Scheme 5) were unsuccessful.
Scheme 5.

(top) kinetic and thermodynamic protonation of η2-(1-sulfonyl-1,3-diene) complexes (10, 11, 13), and conformational change (“allyl shift”), of the resulting η2-allyl complex. (bottom) Conversion of sulfonyldiene complexes to sulfonyl-substituted cyclohexene complexes (29–32) via allyl intermediates (e.g., 28; all compounds are racemic mixtures).
When the sulfonylated η2-diene complex 10 was protonated (HOTf/CH3CN) at −30 °C and the resulting solution treated with NaCN, a white precipitate formed. Full 2D NMR analysis of the isolated solid confirmed the formation of the desired trisubstituted η2-cyclohexene complex (31; 65%; Scheme 5). Repeating this reaction at −60 °C increased the yield of the precipitate (31) to 82%. NOE and COSY data indicate that the CN− adds to what was initially the para carbon of the phenyl sulfone, anti to the metal. Analogous reactions successfully converted sulfonylated diene complexes 11 and 13 into trisubstituted cyclohexene complexes (29, 32). Replacing the cyanide with other nucleophiles resulted in a similar reaction sequence. For example, a solution of 2-azetidinone was deprotonated with NaOtBu then added to allyl 28 to give trisubstituted cyclohexene 30 (Scheme 5).
When sulfonylated diene complex 20 was treated with the nucleophiles LiDMM or NaCN (Scheme 6), the reaction sequence took a different course: Subjecting complex 20 to acid followed by NaCN, two complexes (36A and 36B) resulted from the double addition of cyanide, with concomitant loss of the sulfone group. Presumably, the reaction occurs via an intermediate sulfonylcyclohexene 34. Subsequent loss of the sulfinate anion results in an allyl complex that can react with CN− with either the distal or proximal conformer of the allyl complex to generate the 3,4-dicyano (36B) or 3,6-dicyanocyclohexene species (36A), respectively (Scheme 6). Through a similar sequence, the 3,6-disubstituted bis-malonate 35 was generated via the allyl sulfone complex 33, but in this case, only the 3,6-substitution pattern is observed.
Scheme 6.

Second protonation/nucleophilic addition of cyanide to the arene ring (racemic mixture).
Protonation of either diene complex 10 or 11 followed by the addition of TBAB resulted in the monosubstituted cyclohexene complex 37. In this case the purported cyclohexene D (Scheme 7) loses sulfinate then adds the second hydride (i.e., an SN1 reaction mechanism). Analysis of compound 37 revealed that the alkyl substituent is oriented toward the PMe3. The proximal allyl conformation (E in Scheme 7) is expected to be unstable with respect to the distal form (F),46 and hydride addition occurs with the latter conformer to form 37. In contrast, when the sulfonylated diene 10 or 11 was treated with acid followed by LiDMM, the trialkylated η2-cyclohexene complex 38 is produced. Apparently, 10 and 11 undergo the addition of the malonate, but then rapidly lose the sulfinate to form allyl B (Scheme 7). Although allyl B is expected to be unstable with respect to its conformer C, steric interactions apparently inhibit reaction adjacent to the DMM group and the 3,4,6-trisubstituted cyclohexene product 38 forms. Repeating this reaction with only one equivalent of LiDMM generates half an equivalent of product and the parent allyl. This tandem addition and substitution sequence from 10 to 38 occurred in less than 10 minutes. However, if the reaction is allowed to stand overnight, the product undergoes an isomerization to form 39.
Scheme 7.

Double nucleophilic additions to η2-1-sulfonyl-1,3-diene complexes (racemic mixture).
The stereochemical assignments for both 38 and 39 are supported by NOESY and COSY correlations between the five methine ring hydrogens. Further, DFT calculations determine that 39 is roughly equal in free energy to its isomer 38 (Scheme 7). Of note, if 38 is isolated, washed with hexanes, and dried before being placed into a solution of acetonitrile, then no epimerization is observed over a period of 48 h, indicating that the epimerization is catalyzed by an impurity in the initial reaction mixture.
In the synthesis of trisubstituted cyclohexene complexes 31 or 32 (see Scheme 5), the η2-1,3-cyclohexadiene complex 40 was often observed as a biproduct in the filtrate, and its formation was markedly enhanced in the presence of silica. In a similar manner, diene complex 41 was generated in the formation of 29 from 13, and this diene complex could be made exclusively if the reaction solution was run down silica. X-ray crystal structure determinations (Figure 3) confirm the identity of 40 and the analog 41 as desulfonylated diene complexes.
Figure 3.

SC-XRD molecular structure determinations (50% ellipsoids) of the η2-diene complexes (40; mirror image and 41).
Sulfones are generally regarded as robust functional groups, with elimination occurring only at high temperatures (ca. 500 °C) through an intramolecular process (Ei).34 However, elimination of sulfinic acid was observed to occur on silica for a tosylated glucopyranoside in which the tosylated carbon was attached to an oxygen.36 Fujita et al. also demonstrated that β-tributylstannyl sulfones undergo elimination on silica to form the corresponding alkene, whereas without the silica, refluxing xylenes was required to achieve elimination.37 Ley et al. demonstrated that α-sulfonated cyclic ethers or cyclic amides could undergo substitution or elimination with a suitable nucleophile in the presence of a Lewis acid such as MgBr2.39, 40 This behavior is similar to that observed for the tungsten allyl sulfones of the present report, where the tungsten-bound alkene moiety serves as the π-donor, facilitating loss of a sufinate anion (Scheme 8) in tandem with a Lewis acid. With the tungsten acting as a π donor, exposing 31 to silica promotes the elimination of the sulfinic acid and formation of 40 (Scheme 9). It was also observed that when salts of stabilized carbanions such as NaCN or LiDMM were used, no external Lewis acid was needed (beyond the alkali metal cation). Parenthetically, Pd(0) has been used to catalyze the allylic substitution of allylic sulfones,48 where one can consider the metal as stabilizing both allyl and sulfonate fragments.
Scheme 8.

Sulfone substitution reactions (LA = Lewis acid).
Scheme 9.

Formation of disubstituted η2-diene complexes from sulfonylated cyclohexene or sulfonylated cyclohexadiene complexes (racemic mixtures).
Given the tendency of allyl sulfones (e.g., A in Scheme 7 or 33 and 34 in Scheme 6) to undergo elimination in the presence of even mild Lewis acids (e.g. sodium salts or silica), we sought to prepare desulfonylated diene complexes to serve as synthons of the allyl sulfone complexes. Curiously, treatment of the sulfonylated cyclohexene 31 (Scheme 9) with acid (HOTf/MeOH, HOTf/CH3CN, HOTf/acetone, diphenyl ammonium triflate (DPhAT) or base (triethylamine) alone failed to cause any reaction. However, we were able to prepare diene complexes directly after addition of the second nucleophile simply by treating the solution with silica. Hence, diene complexes 10 – 13 were smoothly converted to their desulfonylated analogs 40 – 42.
Diene complexes 40 and 42 could then be protonated and treated with a third independent nucleophile to generate trisubstituted cyclohexene complexes 46 and 47. Alternatively, the sulfone group of 31 could also be directly substituted with other nucleophiles via the diene intermediate 40 with the nucleophilic salts LiDMM, TBAB, or NaCN to form cyclohexenes 43, 44, and 45 respectively (Scheme 10; Figure 4). This substitution was accomplished without the need for external acid. However, the sulfone substitution did not proceed in the case of neutral nucleophiles such as methylamine, dimethylamine, or MMTP. To circumvent this, diene 40 was protonated at low temperature to form the purported allyl intermediate, which then cleanly reacts with imidazole to provide the trisubstituted cyclohexene 46 (Scheme 10). The analogous reaction was demonstrated for the ester-azetidinone diene complex 42 and NaCN to form 47. Of note, several other amines have been shown to add to π - allyl complexes of the form WTp(NO)(PMe3)(η2-C6H9)]+.49
Scheme 10.

Addition of the third nucleophile either via replacement of the sulfone or from addition to the η2-diene (racemic mixtures).
Figure 4.

SC-XRD molecular structure determination (50% ellipsoids) of the disubstituted η2-cyclohexene complex (43).
Previous studies have shown that cyclohexenes can be liberated from the {WTp(NO)(PMe3)} system using a variety of different oxidants, including Ag+, [FeCp2]+, DDQ, NOPF6, CAN, and even O2. Twelve examples are provided in Table 3. These cyclohexenes (48–59) were liberated from the metal through oxidation with the NOPF6 in yields ranging from 54 to 76 %. As a representative example, compound 57, which contains acetate, azetidinone, and nitrile fragments, can be prepared in overall 15% yield (5 steps) from the anisole complex 1 (1.0 g of 1 yields 74 mg of 57). Chiral sulfones are common building blocks found in biologically active compounds, especially where the sulfone bears a stereocenter at the α or β carbon (e.g., Otezla).31, 50 Of note, chiral sulfonylated cyclohexenes have been explored as anti-sepsis agents.51
Table 3.
Decomplexation of functionalized cyclohexenes (racemic mixtures).
|
In recent years there has been an explosion of new methods for dearomatization of benzenes8 including catalytic hydrogenations52, 53 enzymatic oxidations,54 radical cyclizations,55, 56 photochemical and thermal cycloadditions,9, 57–60 as well as transition metal mediated methods.7, 11–13, 61 Regarding the last approach, arenes can be coordinated through two, four, or six carbons, with η6-arene complexes such as Cr(CO)3(η6-benzene) being the most common method.11 In such compounds the metal acts as an electron-withdrawing group and the arene is activated toward nucleophilic addition reactions. We note that while methoxy groups and halides are well known as leaving groups for η6-benzene complexes of Cr(CO)3 and [Mn(CO)3]+,62, 63 sulfinates have not been utilized for such purposes, although several examples of η6-sulfone complexes have been documented.64–67
The dihapto-coordinate dearomatization of benzene by π-basic metal fragments has been extensively investigated for arenes containing a π-donor substituent such as anisoles,15, 21, 68, 69 phenols,16–18, 70 and anilines.19, 71, 72 The closest prior example of a reaction sequence in which a metal mediates three additions to an aromatic ring was a single example with an osmium anisole derivative.22 In that case, addition of an electrophile at C4 followed by nucleophilic addition at C3 generated an methoxydiene complex. Subsequent reduction and substitution of the methoxy group provided a trisubstituted cyclohexene.73 The tungsten complex in the present study is π-basic enough to promote protonation of the arene even in the presence of the electron-withdrawing sulfonyl group. The resulting η2-arenium complex readily reacts with a broad range of nucleophiles. Because the metal only occupies one double bond of the benzene ring, the entire process can be repeated. The distinguishing feature of the current study is the ability of the EWG substituent to be replaced with a third independent nucleophile. And, as demonstrated above, in addition to using the sulfone or sulfonamide as a leaving group, these medicinally relevant functional groups can be left intact.74, 75 Of the twelve novel substituted cyclohexenes prepared as examples of this methodology, nine (48, 51, 53 – 59) meet the criteria of Lipinski’s rule of five76 for evaluating drug likeliness, as well as the criteria of Ghose,77 Veber,78 Egan,79 and Muegge.80 This indicates that these nine compounds have a high probability of showing desirable biological availability.
CONCLUSION
The coordination of methyl phenyl sulfone, diphenyl sulfone, and phenylsulfonyl pyrrolidine by the π-base WTp(NO)(PMe3) increases the electron density of the phenyl ring, which enables the selective protonation of the carbon ortho to the sulfone group. The resulting η2-arenium complexes undergo nucleophilic addition with a range of nucleophiles to yield conjugated η2-diene species. In turn, these diene complexes can undergo a second protonation and nucleophilic addition, leading to trisubstituted cyclohexenes. The sulfone can then be substituted for a third independent nucleophile. Without exception, this reaction sequence produces a predictable regio- and stereochemical pattern for the cyclohexene ligand, which is liberated from the metal through oxidative decomplexation. Through this methodology, not only can cis,cis-3,4,6 trisubstituted cyclohexenes be generated, but through appropriate use of hydride, cis-3,4-, and cis-3,6-cyclohexene patterns are also achieved. The range of demonstrated nucleophiles includes stabilized enolates, N-heterocycles, and amines, amides. Given that WTp(NO)(PMe3)(benzene) and its derivatives can be prepared in enantioenriched form,81 the compounds reported herein should be accessible as single enantiomers.24, 45 Work is currently underway to carry out controlled epimerizations in the cyclohexene ring via a deprotonation/protonation sequence, in order to achieve trans- substitution patterns for the cyclohexene ring, where the influence of the metal can be leveraged still further.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Research reported in this publication was supported by the NIGMS of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01GM132205 (80%) and the University of Virginia (20%). Single crystal X-ray diffraction experiments were performed on a diffractometer at the University of Virginia funded by the NSF-MRI program (CHE-2018870).
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the University of Virginia.
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supporting Information Available:
1H and 13C NMR spectra of selected compounds, and crystallographic information for compounds 11, 14 – 17, 21, 40, 41, and 43. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org CCDC 2088188–2088194 and 2162397–2162398 deposition numbers contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures
REFERENCES
- 1.Tan DS, Diversity-oriented synthesis: exploring the intersections between chemistry and biology. Nat. Chem. Biol 2005, 1, 74–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lovering F; Bikker J; Humblet C, Escape from Flatland: Increasing Saturation as an Approach to Improving Clinical Success. J. Med. Chem 2009, 52, 6752–6756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ishikawa M; Hashimoto Y, Improvement in Aqueous Solubility in Small Molecule Drug Discovery Programs by Disruption of Molecular Planarity and Symmetry. J. Med. Chem 2011, 54, 1539–1554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Taylor RD; MacCoss M; Lawson ADG, Rings in Drugs. J. Med. Chem 2014, 57, 5845–5859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vitaku E; Smith DT; Njardarson JT, Analysis of the Structural Diversity, Substitution Patterns, and Frequency of Nitrogen Heterocycles among U.S. FDA Approved Pharmaceuticals. J. Med. Chem 2014, 57, 10257–10274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bemis GW; Murcko MA, The Properties of Known Drugs. 1. Molecular Frameworks. J. Med. Chem 1996, 39, 2887–2893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liebov BK; Harman WD, Group 6 Dihapto-Coordinate Dearomatization Agents for Organic Synthesis. Chem. Rev 2017, 117, 13721–13755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wertjes WC; Southgate EH; Sarlah D, Recent advances in chemical dearomatization of nonactivated arenes. Chem. Soc. Rev 2018, 47, 7996–8017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Southgate EH; Pospech J; Fu J; Holycross DR; Sarlah D, Dearomative dihydroxylation with arenophiles. Nature Chemistry 2016, 8, 922–928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.McAtee RC; Noten EA; Stephenson CRJ, Arene dearomatization through a catalytic N-centered radical cascade reaction. Nat. Commun 2020, 11, 2528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pape AR; Kaliappan KP; Kündig EP, Transition-Metal-Mediated Dearomatization Reactions. Chem. Rev 2000, 100, 2917–2940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Harman WD, The Activation of Aromatic Molecules with Pentaammineosmium(II). Chem. Rev 1997, 97, 1953–1978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Keane JM; Harman WD, A New Generation of Pi-Basic Dearomatization Agents. Organometallics. 2005, 24, 1786–1798. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pienkos JA; Zottig VE; Iovan DA; Li M; Harrison DP; Sabat M; Salomon RJ; Strausberg L; Teran VA; Myers WH; Harman WD, Friedel–Crafts Ring-Coupling Reactions Promoted by Tungsten Dearomatization Agent. Organometallics 2013, 32, 691–703. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lis EC; Salomon RJ; Sabat M; Myers WH; Harman WD, Synthesis of 1-Oxadecalins from Anisole Promoted by Tungsten. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 12472–12476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zottig VE; Todd MA; Nichols-Nielander AC; Harrison DP; Sabat M; Myers WH; Harman WD, Epoxidation, Cyclopropanation, and Electrophilic Addition Reactions at the meta Position of Phenol and meta-Cresol. Organometallics 2010, 29, 4793–4803. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Todd MA; Sabat M; Myers WH; Smith TM; Harman WD, Stereoselective Umpolung Tandem Addition of Heteroatoms to Phenol. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 6906–6907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Todd MA; Sabat M; Myers WH; Harman WD, [2+2] Cycloaddition Reactions with a Tungsten-Stabilized 2H-Phenol. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129, 11010–11011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Salomon RJ; Todd MA; Sabat M; Myers WH; Harman WD, Single and Double Electrophilic Addition Reactions to the Aniline Ring Promoted by a Tungsten π-Base. Organometallics 2010, 29, 707–709. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kolis SP; Chordia MD; Liu R; E. KM; Harman WD, Activation of Styrenes Towards Diels-Alder Cycloadditions by Osmium(II): Synthesis of Stereodefined Decalin Ring Systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1998, 120, 2218–2226. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kolis SP; Kopach ME; Liu R; Harman WD, Activation of Benzylic Carbons of Arene Complexes: Osmium Promoted Michael-Aldol Cyclization Reactions of 3-Alkylated Anisoles that Form Functionalized Decalins. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1998, 120, 6205–6211. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kopach ME; Kolis SP; Liu R; Robertson JW; Chordia MD; Harman WD, Stereodefined Tandem Addition Reactions of η2- Arenes: A Versatile Route to Functionalized Cyclohexenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1998, 120, 6199–6204. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Keane JM; Ding F; Sabat M; Harman WD, Solid-State Induced Control of Kinetically Unstable Stereoisomers. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2004, 126, 785–789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wilson KB; Myers JT; Nedzbala HS; Combee LA; Sabat M; Harman WD, Sequential Tandem Addition to a Tungsten–Trifluorotoluene Complex: A Versatile Method for the Preparation of Highly Functionalized Trifluoromethylated Cyclohexenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 11401–11412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Myers JT; Smith JA; Dakermanji SJ; Wilde JH; Wilson KB; Shivokevich PJ; Harman WD, Molybdenum(0) Dihapto-Coordination of Benzene and Trifluorotoluene: The Stabilizing and Chemo-Directing Influence of a CF3 Group. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 11392–11400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Graham PM; Mocella CJ; Sabat M; Harman WD, Dihapto-Coordinated Amide, Ester, and Aldehyde Complexes and Their Role in Decarbonylation. Organometallics 2005, 24, 911–919. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lis EC; Delafuente DA; Lin Y; Mocella CJ; Todd MA; Liu W; Sabat M; Myers WH; Harman WD, The Uncommon Reactivity of Dihapto-Coordinated Nitrile, Ketone, and Alkene Ligands When Bound to a Powerful π-Base. Organometallics 2006, 25, 5051–5058. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Welch KD; Harrison DP; Lis EC; Liu W; Salomon RJ; Harman WD; Myers WH, Large-Scale Syntheses of Several Synthons to the Dearomatization Agent {TpW(NO)(PMe3)} and Convenient Spectroscopic Tools for Product Analysis. Organometallics 2007, 26, 2791–2794. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Smith JA; Simpson SR; Westendorff KS; Weatherford-Pratt J; Myers JT; Wilde JH; Dickie DA; Harman WD, η2 Coordination of Electron-Deficient Arenes with Group 6 Dearomatization Agents. Organometallics 2020, 39, 2493–2510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Martins P; Jesus J; Santos S; Raposo LR; Roma-Rodrigues C; Baptista PV; Fernandes AR, Heterocyclic Anticancer Compounds: Recent Advances and the Paradigm Shift towards the Use of Nanomedicine’s Tool Box. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 2015, 20, 16852–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Feng M; Tang B; Liang HS; Jiang X, Sulfur Containing Scaffolds in Drugs: Synthesis and Application in Medicinal Chemistry. Curr Top Med Chem 2016, 16, 1200–1216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Surur AS; Schulig L; Link A, Interconnection of sulfides and sulfoxides in medicinal chemistry. Archiv der Pharmazie 2019, 352, 1800248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wallace TJ; Hofmann JE; Schriesheim A, Base-Catalyzed Elimination Studies on Sulfones, Sulfoxides, Sulfides, Disulfides, and Mercaptans in Dimethyl Sulfoxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1963, 85, 2739–2743. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cubbage JW; Vos BW; Jenks WS, Ei Elimination: An Unprecedented Facet of Sulfone Chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2000, 122, 4968–4971. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Guan Y; Wang C; Wang D; Dang G; Chen C; Zhou H; Zhao X, Methylsulfone as a leaving group for synthesis of hyperbranched poly(arylene pyrimidine ether)s by nucleophilic aromatic substitution. RSC Advances 2015, 5, 12821–12823. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sakakibara T; Suganuma T; Kajihara Y, Preparation of 2-deoxy-2-C-p-tolylsulfonyl-β-d-glucopyranosyl p-tolyl sulfones having non-chair conformation and their elimination reactions. Chem. Commun 2007, 3568–3570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ochiai M; Ukita T; Fujita E, A new desulphonylation of α,β-unsaturated sulphones via conjugate addition of tributylstannyl-lithium. JCS Chem. Commun 1983, 619–620. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Trost BM, Sulfones as Chemical Chameleons: Versatile Synthetic Equivalents of Small-Molecule Synthons. Chem. Eur. J 2019, 25, 11193–11213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Brown DS; Charreau P; Hansson T; Ley SV, Substitution reactions of 2-phenylsulphonyl-piperidines and -pyrrolidines with carbon nucleophiles: Synthesis of the pyrrolidine alkaloids norruspoline and ruspolinone. Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 1311–1328. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Brown DS; Ley SV; Vile S, Preparation of cyclic ether acetals from 2-benzenesulphonylderivatives: a new mild glycosidation procedure. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 4873–4876. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Smith JA; Schouten A; Wilde JH; Westendorff KS; Dickie DA; Ess DH; Harman WD, Experiments and Direct Dynamics Simulations That Probe η2-Arene/Aryl Hydride Equilibria of Tungsten Benzene Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142, 16437–16454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu W; Welch K; Trindle CO; Sabat M; Myers WH; Harman WD, Facile Intermolecular Aryl−F Bond Cleavage in the Presence of Aryl C−H Bonds: Is the η2-Arene Intermediate Bypassed? Organometallics 2007, 26, 2589–2597. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shree MV; Fabulyak D; Baillie RA; Lefèvre GP; Dettelbach K; Béthegnies A; Patrick BO; Legzdins P; Rosenfeld DC, Multiple C–H Activations of Linear Alkanes by Various (η5-Cyclopentadienyl)W(NO)(CH2CMe3)2 Complexes. Organometallics 2017, 36, 2714–2726. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Baillie RA; Patrick BO; Legzdins P; Rosenfeld DC, Functionalization of Methane Initiated by Cp*W(NO)(CH2CMe3)(η3-CH2CHCMe2). Organometallics 2017, 36, 26–38. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wilson KB; Smith JA; Nedzbala HS; Pert EK; Dakermanji SJ; Dickie DA; Harman WD, Highly Functionalized Cyclohexenes Derived from Benzene: Sequential Tandem Addition Reactions Promoted by Tungsten. J. Org. Chem 2019, 84, 6094–6116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Harrison DP; Nichols-Nielander AC; Zottig VE; Strausberg L; Salomon RJ; Trindle CO; Sabat M; Gunnoe TB; Iovan DA; Myers WH; Harman WD, Hyperdistorted Tungsten Allyl Complexes and Their Stereoselective Deprotonation to Form Dihapto-Coordinated Dienes. Organometallics 2011, 30, 2587–2597. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Smith JA; Wilson KB; Sonstrom RE; Kelleher PJ; Welch KD; Pert EK; Westendorff KS; Dickie DA; Wang X; Pate BH; Harman WD, Preparation of cyclohexene isotopologues and stereoisotopomers from benzene. Nature 2020, 581 (7808), 288–293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hutchins RO; Learn K, Regio- and stereoselective reductive replacement of allylic oxygen, sulfur, and selenium functional groups by hydride via catalytic activation by palladium(0) complexes. J. Org. Chem 1982, 47, 4380–4382. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wilson KB; Nedzbala HS; Simpson SR; Ericson MN; Westendorff KS; Chordia MD; Dickie DA; Harman WD, Hydroamination of Dihapto-Coordinated Benzene and Diene Complexes of Tungsten: Fundamental Studies and the Synthesis of γ-Lycorane. Helv. Chim. Acta 2021, 104, e2100103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Cao S; Hong W; Ye Z; Gong L, Photocatalytic three-component asymmetric sulfonylation via direct C(sp3)-H functionalization. Nat. Commun 2021, 12, 2377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Yamada M; Ichikawa T; Ii M; Itoh K; Tamura N; Kitazaki T, Novel cyclohexene derivatives as anti-sepsis agents: Synthetic studies and inhibition of NO and cytokine production. Bioorg. Med. Chem 2008, 16, 3941–3958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dyson PJ, Arene hydrogenation by homogeneous catalysts: fact or fiction? Dalton Trans. 2003, 2964–2974. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Giustra ZX; Ishibashi JSA; Liu S-Y, Homogeneous metal catalysis for conversion between aromatic and saturated compounds. Coord. Chem. Rev 2016, 314, 134–181. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hudlicky T; Entwistle DA; Pitzer KK; Thorpe AJ, Modern Methods of Monosaccharide Synthesis from Non-Carbohydrate Sources. Chem. Rev 1996, 96, 1195–1220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ohno H; Okumura M; Maeda S.-i.; Iwasaki H; Wakayama R; Tanaka T, Samarium(II)-Promoted Radical Spirocyclization onto an Aromatic Ring. J. Org. Chem 2003, 68, 7722–7732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wefelscheid UK; Berndt M; Reißig H-U, Samarium Diiodide Mediated Ketyl–Aryl Coupling Reactions – Influence of Substituents and Trapping Experiments. Eur. J. Org. Chem 2008, 2008, 3635–3646. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Remy R; Bochet CG, Arene–Alkene Cycloaddition. Chem. Rev 2016, 116, 9816–9849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jacquemot G; Ménard M-A; L’Homme C; Canesi S, Oxidative cycloaddition and cross-coupling processes on unactivated benzene derivatives. Chemical Science 2013, 4, 1287–1292. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lee S; Chataigner I; Piettre SR, Facile Dearomatization of Nitrobenzene Derivatives and Other Nitroarenes with N-Benzyl Azomethine Ylide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2011, 50, 472–476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Schmidt Y; Lam JK; Pham HV; Houk KN; Vanderwal CD, Studies on the Himbert Intramolecular Arene/Allene Diels–Alder Cycloaddition. Mechanistic Studies and Expansion of Scope to All-Carbon Tethers. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2013, 135, 7339–7348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Transition Metal Arene Complexes in Organic Synthesis and Catalysis; Kündig EP, Ed.; Springer, Berlin, 2004, Topics in Organometallic Chemistry Vol. 7. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rose-Munch F; Rose E, cine and tele Nucleophilic Substitutions in (η6-Arene)tricarbonylchromium and Tricarbonyl(η5-cyclohexadienyl)manganese Complexes. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem 2002, 2002 (6), 1269–1283. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Semmelhack MF; Chlenov A, (Arene)Cr(CO)3 Complexes: Aromatic Nucleophilic Substitution. In Transition Metal Arene π-Complexes in Organic Synthesis and Catalysis, Kündig EP, Ed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2004; pp 43–69. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gibson SE; Guillo N; White AJP; Williams DJ, A reactivity study of [η6-(tert-butylsulfonyl)benzene]-tricarbonylchromium(0). J. Chem. Soc. Perkin trans 1996, 2575–2581. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Zhao Z; Messinger J; Schön U; Wartchow R; Butenschön H, Unanticipated formation of ortho-sulfone substituted phenols by anionic thia-Fries rearrangement of (aryl triflate)tricarbonylchromium complexes. Chem. Commun 2006, 3007–3009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Davies G, S.; Loveridge, T.; Fatima C. C. Teixeira, M.; M. Clough, J., Asymmetric synthesis of sulfinyl-substituted arene chromium tricarbonyl complexes. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin trans 1999, 3405–3412. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Marcos CF; Perrio S; Slawin AMZ; Thomas SE; Willams DJ, First synthesis of sulfonyl substituted tricarbonyl(η6-arene)chromium(0) complexed. JCS Chem. Commun 1994, 753–754. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Smith PL; Keane JM; Shankman SE; Chordia MD; Harman WD, Michael Addition Reactions with eta-2-Coordinated Anisoles: Controlling the Stereochemistry of the Para and Benzylic Carbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2004, 126, 15543–15551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kopach ME; Harman WD, The Osmium-Promoted [4+2] Cycloaddition Reaction of Anisole and Characterization of the η2-4H-Anisolium Intermediate. J. Org. Chem 1994, 59, 6506–6507. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kopach ME; Harman WD, Novel Michael Additions to Phenols Promoted by Osmium(II): Convenient Stereoselective Syntheses of 2,4- and 2,5-Cyclohexadienones. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1994, 116, 6581–6592. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Gonzalez J; Sabat M; Harman WD, A Novel Dearomatization of Anilines via Complexation to Pentaammineosmium(II): Synthesis of Highly Functionalized 3-Aminocyclohexenes from Anilines. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1993, 115, 8857–8858. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Kolis SP; Gonzalez J; Bright LM; Harman WD, Dearomatization of Anilines by Coordination to Pentaammineosmium(II). Organometallics 1996, 15, 245–259. [Google Scholar]
- 73.Chordia MD; Harman WD, Asymmetric Dearomatization of η2-Arene Complexes: Synthesis of Stereodefined Functionalized Cyclohexenones and Cyclohexenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2000, 122, 2725–2736. [Google Scholar]
- 74.Reitz AB; Smith GR; Parker MH, The role of sulfamide derivatives in medicinal chemistry: a patent review (2006–2008). Expert Opin Ther Pat 2009, 19, 1449–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Feng M; Tang B; Liang SH; Jiang X, Sulfur Containing Scaffolds in Drugs: Synthesis and Application in Medicinal Chemistry. Curr Top Med Chem 2016, 16, 1200–1216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Lipinski CA; Lombardo F; Dominy BW; Feeney PJ, Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2001, 46 (1–3), 3–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Ghose AK; Viswanadhan VN; Wendoloski JJ, A knowledge-based approach in designing combinatorial or medicinal chemistry libraries for drug discovery. 1. A qualitative and quantitative characterization of known drug databases. J Comb Chem 1999, 1, 55–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Veber DF; Johnson SR; Cheng HY; Smith BR; Ward KW; Kopple KD, Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. J Med Chem 2002, 45, 2615–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Egan WJ; Merz KM Jr.; Baldwin JJ, Prediction of drug absorption using multivariate statistics. J Med Chem 2000, 43, 3867–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Muegge I; Heald SL; Brittelli D, Simple selection criteria for drug-like chemical matter. J. Med. Chem 2001, 44, 1841–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Lankenau AW; Iovan DA; Pienkos JA; Salomon RJ; Wang S; Harrison DP; Myers WH; Harman WD, Enantioenrichment of a Tungsten Dearomatization Agent Utilizing Chiral Acids. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 3649–3655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
